On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Darius Blaszyk wrote:
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 20:39 +0100, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Contributions are more than welcome, as long as they adhere to a strict
rule: I don't publish documentation for a unit unless it is complete.
Does that mean that partial documented xml f
2010/12/6 Darius Blaszyk :
> On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 20:39 +0100, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
>> Contributions are more than welcome, as long as they adhere to a strict
>> rule: I don't publish documentation for a unit unless it is complete.
>
> Does that mean that partial documented xml files are a
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 20:39 +0100, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> Contributions are more than welcome, as long as they adhere to a strict
> rule: I don't publish documentation for a unit unless it is complete.
Does that mean that partial documented xml files are allowed to be added
to SVN, but that
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Darius Blaszyk wrote:
I did the unthinkable ;) by trying to write some documentation for an
FPC package. I searched FPC without success after which I got fpcdocs
from SVN, no luck either. I only found some files included in Lazarus
(\docs\xml\).
What is the plan for the la
On 06/12/2010 18:48, Martin wrote:
I compile the same app with eithe 2.4.2 or trunk
The app uses an exception and refers to exception.Message
with 2.4.2 gdb knows what shortstring is, with trunk gdb doesn't.
Any one any idea?
Sorry found it:
my 2.4.2 was compiled with debug info my tru
I compile the same app with eithe 2.4.2 or trunk
The app uses an exception and refers to exception.Message
with 2.4.2 gdb knows what shortstring is, with trunk gdb doesn't.
Any one any idea?
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
h
I did the unthinkable ;) by trying to write some documentation for an
FPC package. I searched FPC without success after which I got fpcdocs
from SVN, no luck either. I only found some files included in Lazarus
(\docs\xml\).
What is the plan for the lack of documentation on packages? Should I add
p
Henry Vermaak wrote:
On 6 December 2010 10:05, Mark Morgan Lloyd
wrote:
Henry Vermaak wrote:
Just interested, how would you do this? Does win ce have an ssh server?
Unless I'm badly missing the point: these boards have full video etc. so can
run programs in exactly the way that "real" comput
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd
wrote:
I'm currently rereading the Build FAQ- slowly and carefully. Is it still the
case that native CE is under-exercised? I've got a board here- basically an
ARM-based PC- that I could fire up and use for te
In our previous episode, Mark Morgan Lloyd said:
> > Unfortunately, my sheeva doesn't have X (yet); it's root is on flash.
> >
> > I also uploaded armel cross-binutils windows->arm-linux. (see msg yesterday)
>
> I'm currently rereading the Build FAQ- slowly and carefully. Is it still
> the case
On 6 December 2010 10:05, Mark Morgan Lloyd
wrote:
> Henry Vermaak wrote:
>>
>> Just interested, how would you do this? Does win ce have an ssh server?
>
> Unless I'm badly missing the point: these boards have full video etc. so can
> run programs in exactly the way that "real" computers do.
Oh,
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd
wrote:
> I'm currently rereading the Build FAQ- slowly and carefully. Is it still the
> case that native CE is under-exercised? I've got a board here- basically an
> ARM-based PC- that I could fire up and use for testing.
Any exercising for ARM a
Henry Vermaak wrote:
On 06/12/10 09:33, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd
wrote:
I'm currently rereading the Build FAQ- slowly and carefully. Is it
still the
case that native CE is under-exercised?
What do you mean
On 06/12/10 09:33, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd
wrote:
I'm currently rereading the Build FAQ- slowly and carefully. Is it
still the
case that native CE is under-exercised?
What do you mean by "native CE"?
Run
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd
wrote:
I'm currently rereading the Build FAQ- slowly and carefully. Is it still the
case that native CE is under-exercised?
What do you mean by "native CE"?
Running the compiler etc. on CE, rather than cro
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd
wrote:
> I'm currently rereading the Build FAQ- slowly and carefully. Is it still the
> case that native CE is under-exercised?
What do you mean by "native CE"?
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
___
fpc-
Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Mark Morgan Lloyd said:
I had to go briefly onto 2.5.1 for ARM and found
that it refused to compile Lazarus- if I recall correctly there was a
conditional in the source where anything that wasn't 2.4 was assumed to be
2.2 or older.
You should t
17 matches
Mail list logo
