Hi,
I am writing a unit to "automatically" write Trampoline functions on the
fly. So assigning "plain" callbacks to TMethod's work.
Currently it can handle cdecl on linux32/64. I've tested it with up to 9
parameters and it works well.
I would like to implement whatever is common to interface
win
I'm really surprised that I come off as sounding pro any OS.
Personally, I'm the type of person to remove Windows 7 from my brand
new laptop just to run Ubuntu. I think there is though, some sort of
deep seeded resentment towards event driven methods.
So back to the topic... As it stands I do ha
On 02 Jan 2011, at 18:02, Andrew Brunner wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Jonas Maebe
> wrote:
>
>> Please move this discussion to the fpc-other list.
>
> If by "this" discussion you mean "his" discussion then great.
I mean "discussions about the superiority of one programming parad
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
> Please move this discussion to the fpc-other list.
If by "this" discussion you mean "his" discussion then great. I've
still got outstanding issues with SIGIO / SIGPOLL.
___
fpc-devel maillist -
On 02 Jan 2011, at 17:41, Henry Vermaak wrote:
> On 2 January 2011 15:26, Andrew Brunner wrote:
>> I also want to assert that ideal engineering principals, no matter
>> who/where they come from must be seriously considered with extreme
>> diligence as the lack of such is, at its core, the main r
On 2 January 2011 15:26, Andrew Brunner wrote:
> I also want to assert that ideal engineering principals, no matter
> who/where they come from must be seriously considered with extreme
> diligence as the lack of such is, at its core, the main reason why it
> has taken Linux so long to become widel
On 2 January 2011 15:06, Andrew Brunner wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 5:24 AM, Nikolai Zhubr wrote:
>> Formally yes maybe, but Andrew probably meant just avoiding some horrible
>> CPU-burning busy-loop.
>>
>> Despite of the similar name (epoll), substantial shortcomings of classical
>> polling
On 02 Jan 2011, at 17:07, Frank Church wrote:
> Is there an Objective-Pascal that is not the same of Object Pascal?
http://wiki.freepascal.org/FPC_PasCocoa
Jonas
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/ma
On 2 January 2011 16:00, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> On 30 Dec 2010, at 18:09, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> > So I would propose to change the syntax by moving the "external" modifier
> to the same location as where "sealed" and "abstract" can be placed for
> Delphi-style classes. It should be quite easy to
On 30 Dec 2010, at 18:09, Jonas Maebe wrote:
> So I would propose to change the syntax by moving the "external" modifier to
> the same location as where "sealed" and "abstract" can be placed for
> Delphi-style classes. It should be quite easy to modify the Objective-C
> headers parser script t
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Michael Van Canneyt
wrote:
> All webservers I know use polling on unix, and they are what you might call
> 'high availablility' environments.
There is a big difference between HA and HP :-) While they are
relationally proportional the cost of HA is minimized with
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 5:24 AM, Nikolai Zhubr wrote:
> Formally yes maybe, but Andrew probably meant just avoiding some horrible
> CPU-burning busy-loop.
>
> Despite of the similar name (epoll), substantial shortcomings of classical
> polling scheme are gone. Say, you need not use a timeout to be
On Sun, 2 Jan 2011, Andrew Brunner wrote:
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 4:43 AM, Michael Van Canneyt
wrote:
Do note that you're back to polling, which I understood you wanted to avoid
in the first place ?
Michael.
Sigh - yes, your right. I haven't given up on kernel level signals
(SIGIO/SIGPOLL
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 4:43 AM, Michael Van Canneyt
wrote:
> Do note that you're back to polling, which I understood you wanted to avoid
> in the first place ?
>
> Michael.
Sigh - yes, your right. I haven't given up on kernel level signals
(SIGIO/SIGPOLL) and random posts on various *nix forums
02.01.2011 13:43, Michael Van Canneyt:
On Sat, 1 Jan 2011, Andrew Brunner wrote:
Thanks, Nikolai. epoll looks like the silver bullet (for linux) and
very promising. I can dump a bunch of sockets into it and get the
kernel to let me know which ones get notifications for
reset/read/write.
...W
On Sat, 1 Jan 2011, Andrew Brunner wrote:
Thanks, Nikolai. epoll looks like the silver bullet (for linux) and
very promising. I can dump a bunch of sockets into it and get the
kernel to let me know which ones get notifications for
reset/read/write.
...Which is what I suggested in the first
16 matches
Mail list logo
