> Well what happens when:
>
> - you compile a package with stabs
> - your program with dwarf
>
> Or vice/versa.
>
> What will be in the final exe?
>
Both
> Is the debug info in the ppu already format specific, or
> generic. Will the stabs end up together with the dwarf?
>
Stabs go to the .
2011/9/7 Martin :
> Well what happens when:
>
> - you compile a package with stabs
> - your program with dwarf
>
> Or vice/versa.
>
> What will be in the final exe?
>
> Is the debug info in the ppu already format specific, or generic.
> Will the stabs end up together with the dwarf?
As far as I kn
Well what happens when:
- you compile a package with stabs
- your program with dwarf
Or vice/versa.
What will be in the final exe?
Is the debug info in the ppu already format specific, or generic.
Will the stabs end up together with the dwarf?
Martin
__
On 07 Sep 2011, at 16:29, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 21:58 +0200, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 06 Sep 2011, at 21:48, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Can someone reproduce this? And what to do now? I've even did a
touch on
the rtl/objpas/parser.inc, but that doesn't help.
If yo
On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 21:58 +0200, Jonas Maebe wrote:
> On 06 Sep 2011, at 21:48, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
>
> > Can someone reproduce this? And what to do now? I've even did a touch on
> > the rtl/objpas/parser.inc, but that doesn't help.
>
> If you perform a top level "make all", the RTL and
In our previous episode, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho said:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> > There are only two, 18977, and the one you just committed.
( http://www.stack.nl/~marcov/mergelogs26/ and then "fpvectorial" )
> Yes, but the last one breaks backwards comp
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> There are only two, 18977, and the one you just committed.
Yes, but the last one breaks backwards compatibility, so I though that
it would be better if people already use the new layout. Plus it also
changes the documentation, and I alre
In our previous episode, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho said:
>
> Is it still in time to request mergers? I'd like to request a merge of
> all changes from fpvectorial since the branching.
>
> http://svn.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/trunk/packages/fpvectorial/?view=log
There are only two, 1897
Hello,
Is it still in time to request mergers? I'd like to request a merge of
all changes from fpvectorial since the branching.
http://svn.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/trunk/packages/fpvectorial/?view=log
thanks,
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
__
On 06 Sep 2011, at 14:00, Wookey wrote:
section 5 tells you about the calling conventions, and section 6 about
the normal variants (note the bit about it applying only to
non-variadic functions - does pascal support variadic functions?)
It does, in two ways:
a) calling variadic functions imp
+++ peter green [2011-09-06 02:05 +0100]:
> First a bit of background, on arm ebi gcc has three options for
> "-mfloat-abi"
>
> soft: do all floating point in software, ignore the fpu type selection
> softfp: use the selected fpu type but use the same calling
> conventions as "soft" (that is param
11 matches
Mail list logo
