Just noticed the following
program Project1;
var a: integer deprecated;
begin
if 1 = a
then writeln;
end.
project1.lpr(5,3) Warning: Symbol "a" is deprecated
Which points to the "then" on the line after "a" is used. (even if the
lines a joined, it always points to the next token)
If a is
"
Have you looked at target "embedded" ?
"
Just took a look at it it's still quite big/huge and uses arm ?
"
For what specific platform are you contemplating this for ?
"
None, redcode, cuda.
Mini-fpc could be reduced to show proportions that it becomes virtual, an
exercise at seperating the
3 comments:
"
1) Floating point support is necessary for the compiler to compile/build
itself, because floating point number support needs to be available in the
compiler itself (otherwise source files containing floating point numbers
cannot be processed by the compiler).
"
Why would a basic/co
On 09.09.2011 18:27, Sergei Gorelkin wrote:
09.09.2011 18:36, Martin пишет:
fpc recently added the ability to translate
const Foo: String = resourcestring;
if resourcestring changes so does Foo
Any way to work around this?
Probably only by duplicating the literal value which is used to
initia
In our previous episode, Anton Kavalenka said:
> This being translated always and is Delphi compatible
It is if you use Delphi based resources for translating. It is not if you
use thirdparty translation packages udner Delphi like e.g. dxgettext
___
fpc
On 9 Sep 11, at 14:15, Skybuck Flying wrote:
> "
> 1) Floating point support is necessary for the compiler to compile/build
> itself, because floating point number support needs to be available in the
> compiler itself (otherwise source files containing floating point numbers
> cannot be processed
On 10.09.2011 12:05, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Anton Kavalenka said:
This being translated always and is Delphi compatible
It is if you use Delphi based resources for translating. It is not if you
use thirdparty translation packages udner Delphi like e.g. dxgettext
Skybuck Flying schrieb:
Nano would be:
One integer type, one string type, branch support, loop support, basic
support, object orientation support, property support, array support,
virtual methods support.
You'll have much trouble in *removing* existing features from FPC,
affecting parser,
If a "mini-FPC" were to be created to help popularize the Pascal
language and get beginners interested and up to speed, it would be more
useful to provide a simple IDE than a stripped-down compiler. The
console FP IDE has never worked well for me (crashes a lot) and Lazarus
is very large and in
On Sat, 10 Sep 2011, Jeff Duntemann wrote:
If a "mini-FPC" were to be created to help popularize the Pascal language and
get beginners interested and up to speed, it would be more useful to provide
a simple IDE than a stripped-down compiler. The console FP IDE has never
worked well for me (c
Am 10.09.2011 15:42, schrieb Jeff Duntemann:
If a "mini-FPC" were to be created to help popularize the Pascal
language and get beginners interested and up to speed, it would be more
useful to provide a simple IDE than a stripped-down compiler. The
console FP IDE has never worked well for me (cras
On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 16:51:36 +0200 (CEST)
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 10 Sep 2011, Jeff Duntemann wrote:
>
> > If a "mini-FPC" were to be created to help popularize the Pascal language
> > and
> > get beginners interested and up to speed, it would be more useful to
> > provide
> None, redcode, cuda.
>
> Mini-fpc could be reduced to show proportions that it becomes
> virtual, an
> exercise at seperating the processing of the pascal language
> and giving
> meaning/sense to the tokens so it becomes ready for
> assembling. It could be
> reduced to such a level that it
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Sat, 10 Sep 2011, Jeff Duntemann wrote:
If a "mini-FPC" were to be created to help popularize the Pascal
language and get beginners interested and up to speed, it would be
more useful to provide a simple IDE than a stripped-down compiler. The
console FP IDE has n
>
>
> Have a look at the P4 pascal compiler
> http://homepages.cwi.nl/~steven/pascal/ . The whole compiler is written in
> pascal and is only 4000 lines in 1 file. It generates a high level pcode
> and
> comes with a pcode interpreter (1000 lines of pascal in a second file).
> Simpler you can't get
Hi, I'm trying to compile the SVN Trunk version using FPC 2.5.1 to bootstrap.
I'm working on Windows 32 bits.
Usually I just do this:
e:
cd fpc
svn upmake clean all PP=e:\pp\bin\i386-win32\ppc386.exe
make install
And it worked without problems until today. I do this process once a month.
When
On 10 Sep 2011, at 20:52, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
> Hi, I'm trying to compile the SVN Trunk version using FPC 2.5.1 to bootstrap.
This is wrong. It has always been wrong and will always be wrong. Bootstrapping
has always only been supported and will always only be supported when starting
with
In our previous episode, John Lee said:
> >
> > Maybe we could/should put a fpc compilable version of this into the fpc
> docs, and into the fpc distribution? Can't imagine that one could do
> anything smaller or more portable?
P4 is not FPC compilable. It uses ISO style filehandling iirc.
___
> > > Maybe we could/should put a fpc compilable version of
> this into the
> > > fpc
> > docs, and into the fpc distribution? Can't imagine that one
> could do
> > anything smaller or more portable?
>
> P4 is not FPC compilable. It uses ISO style filehandling
> iirc.
Correct.
And it uses al
> > > Maybe we could/should put a fpc compilable version of
> > this into the
> > > > fpc
> > > docs, and into the fpc distribution? Can't imagine that one
> > could do
> > > anything smaller or more portable?
> >
> > P4 is not FPC compilable. It uses ISO style filehandling
> > iirc.
>
> Correct.
>
Hans-Peter Diettrich schrieb:
It looks like FPDoc links to an inherited item (method), when only a
short description is provided for an overridden method. Is this intended
behaviour? (see Controls.TDragControlObject)
I also have the impression that FPDoc does not (always) overwrite
existing H
That just may do the job.
Three years ago I started rewriting my BP7 Pascal book for FPC, but the
issue of which IDE would be better for beginners drove me nuts. I looked
around for something simple and reliable and eventually set the project
aside. Lazarus is really the way to go for an IDE,
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Jeff Duntemann wrote:
> Three years ago I started rewriting my BP7 Pascal book for FPC, but the
> issue of which IDE would be better for beginners drove me nuts. I looked
> around for something simple and reliable and eventually set the project
> aside. Lazarus is
Hello.
Can the commit nr 18230 be merged into FPC 2.6 ?
http://svn.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=18230
Fixes bug:
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=20003
--
cobines
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
h
24 matches
Mail list logo
