On 11/09/2011 23:40, Jonas Maebe wrote:
> extensions. I don't see the advantage of allocating one of those and
> communicating it to other compiler writers (to avoid them using that
> same extension for something else) instead of submitting it for
> inclusion in the official DWARF standard though.
On 11/09/2011 22:36, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 11/09/2011, Jonas Maebe wrote:
Neither DWARF 3 nor DWARF 4 supports properties. I'm not aware of anyone
submitting a proposal to add them to the DWARF standard either. See e.g.
I was under the impression that you could now define (at least with
On 11 Sep 2011, at 23:36, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 11/09/2011, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>>
>> Neither DWARF 3 nor DWARF 4 supports properties. I'm not aware of anyone
>> submitting a proposal to add them to the DWARF standard either. See e.g.
>
> I was under the impression that you could now de
On 11/09/2011, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> Neither DWARF 3 nor DWARF 4 supports properties. I'm not aware of anyone
> submitting a proposal to add them to the DWARF standard either. See e.g.
I was under the impression that you could now define (at least with
DWARF3 upwards) your own types or language
Michael Van Canneyt schrieb:
I'm a user of fpdoc, not a maintainer, have no idea of the internals.
In that case, please do not say things like
'this extension should not be too hard to implement'
But please, file a bug report so we won't forget.
This whole threads is about bugs and problem
On 11 Sep 2011, at 19:39, Martin wrote:
> Just thought to catch up.
>
> what is the status on dwarf -3 ?
Nothing has changed recently.
> The 2nd idea is about properties. Afaik in dwarf-3 they may even be encodable
> => though I have no idea what gdb would do with the info.
Neither DWARF 3 n
Hello,
Could sb with a recent trunk based system and mysql please try to duplicate
Mantis #15324?
Thanks in advance.
]
Marco
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
On Sun, 11 Sep 2011, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt schrieb:
How do I obtain the latest documentation on FPDoc?
make fpdoc.pdf in docs.
No Latex support here (Win7)
Then no more recent docs than the official ones on the website.
For records with variant parts, no shor
Just thought to catch up.
what is the status on dwarf -3 ?
I just did a test with fpc trunk / gdb 7.3-2 => It appears to work
reasonable good (though I can't test all possibilities).
A few types get messed up, as the idea tries to work dwarf2 or stabs
tricks on the data, but that can probably
Michael Van Canneyt schrieb:
How do I obtain the latest documentation on FPDoc?
make fpdoc.pdf in docs.
No Latex support here (Win7)
For records with variant parts, no short descriptions are shown for
the members in the variant part. Parameters for overloaded methods are
already supporte
In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
> > When heritage is meant, I'd suggest something like "Ancestor ... of ... not
> > found". At least I like messages starting with a fixed part, indicating the
> > message type, not with an identifier.
> >
> > What do the "new alias ..." messages
On Sun, 11 Sep 2011, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Thanks for the improvements in the last updates, but...
How do I obtain the latest documentation on FPDoc?
make fpdoc.pdf in docs.
For records with variant parts, no short descriptions are shown for the
members in the variant part. Parame
> 1. Very old.
1976
> 2. Written by a C programmer or so or a really old pascal
> programmer.
By Wirth and colleagues, the inventor/developer of pascal.
> 4. It has a huge ammount of q's, p's, kl's and
> lpt's as variable names
1976: 4k memory board 100$, 140M hard disk cabinet 8$
There is a slightly more "modern" P5 based off of P4, with source code that can
be compiled using Borland Pascal (and presumably, FPC's Turbo mode should be
close to compiling it as well.)
http://www.standardpascal.org/p5.html
From: Skybuck Flying
To: FPC de
Thanks for the improvements in the last updates, but...
How do I obtain the latest documentation on FPDoc?
For records with variant parts, no short descriptions are shown for the
members in the variant part. Parameters for overloaded methods are
already supported, so this extension should not
"
Have a look at the P4 pascal compiler
"
Ok, I had a look at it.
"
http://homepages.cwi.nl/~steven/pascal/ .
"
Nice site.
"
The whole compiler is written in pascal and is only 4000 lines in 1 file.
"
Line-wise not to bad, the code itself also looks not to bad, but it does
look:
1. Very o
-Original Message-
From: Hans-Peter Diettrich
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2011 2:12 PM
To: FPC developers' list
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] Project Idea: Mini-FPC
Skybuck Flying schrieb:
Nano would be:
One integer type, one string type, branch support, loop support, basic
support,
17 matches
Mail list logo
