Re: [fpc-devel] Breaking change in FPC 2.6.1

2012-04-29 Thread Martin Schreiber
On Thursday 26 April 2012 06:58:01 Martin Schreiber wrote: > On Wednesday 25 April 2012 21:43:30 Marco van de Voort wrote: > > In our previous episode, Marcos Douglas said: > > > > Done, trunk r21037. Affected were tdataset and bufdataset (conversion > > > > between Pbufbookmark and tbytes). > > >

Re: [fpc-devel] Breaking change in FPC 2.6.1

2012-04-29 Thread Alexander Klenin
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 20:28, Marco van de Voort wrote: > Calling a virtual(!) method when a bookmark is no longer needed allows to do > other things too, like releasing something with db handles, and allows > descendents of TDataset to do such things. Did you consider declaring TBookmark an int

Re: [fpc-devel] Breaking change in FPC 2.6.1

2012-04-29 Thread waldo kitty
On 4/27/2012 03:45, Ivan Bobyr wrote: PS: If the main advantage of FPC over C/C++ is its automatic memory management then we should obviously use it, correct ? FWIW and as late to the conversation as it is, i must add that it isn't memory management that's the big plus for pascal languages...

Re: [fpc-devel] improving error message when forgot to use cthreads unit

2012-04-29 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 11:11:08 +0200 Mattias Gaertner wrote: > On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 10:52:08 +0200 (CEST) > Michael Van Canneyt wrote: > > > > > > > On Sat, 28 Apr 2012, Mattias Gaertner wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > When someone forgets to use the cthreads unit and creates a thread the > >