Re: [fpc-devel] about freepascal for mips

2012-05-27 Thread microcode
Thank you. -Original Message- From: "Fuxin Zhang" Sender: fpc-devel-boun...@lists.freepascal.org Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 07:49:43 To: FPC developers' list Reply-To: zhan...@lemote.com, FPC developers' list Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] about freepascal for mips > Hi, I was more inte

Re: [fpc-devel] about freepascal for mips

2012-05-27 Thread Fuxin Zhang
> Hi, I was more interested in the single box version. I forget what you > call > it. I will email Betty, thanks for the connection. I'm looking for a MIPS > box for my own study. It is called Fuloong, and I find I made a mistake, betty's mail is zha...@lemote.com, not be...@lemote.com. >> >> You c

Re: [fpc-devel] about freepascal for mips

2012-05-27 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 27 May 2012, at 21:34, Jonas Maebe wrote: > make TEST_FPC=/full/path/to/ppcrossmipsel TEST_SSH=login@mips-box > TEST_REMOTEPATH=/tmp/tests OPT="-O2 -ap" TEST_OPT="-O2 -ap" QUICKTEST=1 clean > all digest > > Add any additional parameters you need for cross-compilation (-FD, -XR, ...) > to T

Re: [fpc-devel] about freepascal for mips

2012-05-27 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 25 May 2012, at 15:48, Fuxin Zhang wrote: > Now at least we have a very good start. I've a quick look over current > mips code, it seems not strong enough. For example, the inverse_cond seems > wrong, the setting of first_int_imreg/mavarregs/maxfpuvarregs etc. is hard > to understand... first

Re: [fpc-devel] about freepascal for mips

2012-05-27 Thread microcode
On Sat, 26 May 2012 21:00:23 +0800 (CST) zhan...@lemote.com wrote: > microcode wrote > > Hello and may I say > > > > EXCELLENT! > > > > Now all we need to know is where to get a good price on your MIPS boxes > > so we can all run them ;-) > > > Well, we decide to sell some machines at very low pr