On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 08:53 +0200, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 5:15 PM, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
> > can you check whether the correct assembler is used, e.g. change into the
> > rtl directory, and run the ppcrossarm as above with -al -s appended? And
> > then verify
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
> Run
>...
> (I.e. the command line that failed, including "-al -s")
That results in:
Fatal: No source file name in command line
Fatal: Compilation aborted
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
___
fpc-d
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 10:01 +0200, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
> > Run
> >...
> > (I.e. the command line that failed, including "-al -s")
>
> That results in:
>
> Fatal: No source file name in command line
> Fatal: Compilation aborte
Den 08-07-2012 14:42, Thomas Schatzl skrev:
Actually, I saw that armv5 already supports blx, do not know right
now why
it isn't generated in the first place. Did you ever try compiling the
compiler or your program with -Cparmv5? Maybe it's just that the
compiler
default is < armv5?
I never r
In Windows I also have strange issues:
D:\targetandroid>PATH=C:\Programas\lazarus31\fpc\2.6.1\bin\i386-win32
D:\targetandroid>make crossinstall CPU_TARGET=arm OS_TARGET=android OPT="-dFPC_A
RMEL" CROSSOPT="-CpARMv6 -CfSoft" CROSSBINDIR=C:\Programas\android-ndk-r8\toolch
ains\arm-linux-androideabi
Den 09-07-2012 11:20, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho skrev:
makefile:29: *** You need the GNU utils package to use this Makefile. Stop.
Looks like it can't find a proper strip binary. Is your binutils prefix
correct? Maybe you have problems with the backslashes? A silly
suggestion: try changing t
Hi,
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 11:12 +0200, Jeppe Græsdal Johansen wrote:
> Den 08-07-2012 14:42, Thomas Schatzl skrev:
> >>> Actually, I saw that armv5 already supports blx, do not know right
> >>> now why
> >>> it isn't generated in the first place. Did you ever try compiling the
> >>> compiler or y
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Jeppe Græsdal Johansen
wrote:
> Looks like it can't find a proper strip binary. Is your binutils prefix
> correct?
Yes, the prefix is correct
Is it complaining about general binutils, like strip.exe, or about the
cross-binutils?
Anyway, these 2 files do exist:
Hi again,
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 11:33 +0200, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
> >
> > You should be using -Cparmv5t if you want armv5 and blx. The t indicates
> > that the device has thumb support, which most have, but armv5 is usually
> > safer, hence it's the default.
>
> You are right although fpc seem
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote on Mon, 09 Jul 2012:
Is it complaining about general binutils, like strip.exe, or about the
cross-binutils?
That error is only printed if the Makefile cannot find pwd.exe in the
PATH. It should be part of a default FPC 2.6.0 install.
Note that pwd.exe is
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
> That error is only printed if the Makefile cannot find pwd.exe in the PATH.
> It should be part of a default FPC 2.6.0 install.
but I have:
SET PATH=C:\Programas\lazarus31\fpc\2.6.1\bin\i386-win32
And the file C:\Programas\lazarus31\fpc\2.6.
11 matches
Mail list logo
