On 22 July 2012 14:22, Hans-Peter Diettrich drdiettri...@aol.com wrote:
The more I think about these problems, the more I see class helpers as
the natural extension of the language, that allows to implement
extensions which have not been foreseen by the class designers. At the
risk of the
Hi,
I am the author of MSEide+MSEgui, a Free Pascal development environment:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mseide-msegui/
MSEide+MSEgui is not Delphi compatible and handles some basic TComponent
issues differently to Lazarus:
http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/
Is it possible to add
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012, Martin Schreiber wrote:
Hi,
I am the author of MSEide+MSEgui, a Free Pascal development environment:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mseide-msegui/
MSEide+MSEgui is not Delphi compatible and handles some basic TComponent
issues differently to Lazarus:
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012, Martin Schreiber wrote:
On Monday 23 July 2012 15:31:42 michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
I don't see why you cannot do the same. It's perfectly possible to use the
streaming system for both TComponent and other classes. All it takes is
RTTI, which happens to be enabled
In our previous episode, Giuliano Colla said:
As far as Guiliano's suggestion goes, then I rather use a cmdline option for
that (when compiled with that option it is allows to access private fields),
rather than syntax. (but I don't know if the PPU format actually contains
enough info to
On 23 July 2012 17:12, Martin Schreiber mse00...@gmail.com wrote:
Guys, please take into consideration not only Martin but also Graeme,.. :)
Graeme does not need it, fpGUI does not stream components, has no IDE...
For good reason. I don't want the headaches of designing and
supporting a full
Hi,
On 23 July 2012 15:31, Ian Macintosh ian.macint...@igmac.co.uk wrote:
the design concept to me. What Graeme is saying is 100% correct, but also
the wrong way to design imho.
I don't see it like that. I have developed thousands of classes, and
huge frameworks. I often find a new case where
