waldo kitty wrote:
On 1/15/2013 06:01, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 15.01.2013 11:52, schrieb Michael Van Canneyt:
That is a weird assumption. I would go for the second one, hands
down...
I wouldn't if the second one is significantly slower than the fi
On 1/15/2013 06:01, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 15.01.2013 11:52, schrieb Michael Van Canneyt:
That is a weird assumption. I would go for the second one, hands down...
I wouldn't if the second one is significantly slower than the first one.
Otherwise I
In our previous episode, Thomas Schatzl said:
> > >> ?
> > >>
> > >> That is a weird assumption. I would go for the second one, hands down...
> > >
> > > I wouldn't if the second one is significantly slower than the first one.
> > > Otherwise I'd agree :)
> >
> > I agree. It's no big deal waitin
I updated
ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/snapshot/trunk/mipsel-linux/
and
ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/snapshot/trunk/mips-linux/
directories with new snapshots dated from 2013-01-15.
Tell us if these work better,
Pierre Muller
> -Message d'origine-
> De : fpc-devel-boun...@l
On 15 Jan 2013, at 13:44, SkyDiablo wrote:
$ make "OPT=-O- -g" -C compiler mips
make: Gehe in Verzeichnis '/usr/local/src/fpc-trunk/compiler'
make PPC_TARGET=mips CPU_UNITDIR=mips all
make[1]: Betrete Verzeichnis '/usr/local/src/fpc-trunk/compiler'
/usr/bin/ppc386 -Fumips -Fusystems -Fu../rtl/u
SkyDiablo wrote:
Am 15.01.2013 11:46, schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd:
SkyDiablo wrote:
hi ho,
i'm back again ;) i have try this:
http://www.mail-archive.com/fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org/msg27336.html
but my Ubuntu Desktop 12.04 LTS can't run the "ppcmips" binary?
$ chmod +x ppcmips
$ ./ppcmips
Am 15.01.2013 11:46, schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd:
SkyDiablo wrote:
hi ho,
i'm back again ;) i have try this:
http://www.mail-archive.com/fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org/msg27336.html
but my Ubuntu Desktop 12.04 LTS can't run the "ppcmips" binary?
$ chmod +x ppcmips
$ ./ppcmips -iV
bash: ./ppcmi
On 01/15/2013 01:15 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
The X-Terminal is not the X-Server for the device.
Sorry for inappropriate wording. I meant the X-Terminal is the TCP/IP
Server.
-Michael
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists
Am 15.01.2013 12:21, schrieb Michael Schnell:
On 01/15/2013 12:01 PM, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
Do it on the device. Either directly or remote via NX, VNC or even
X-forwarding is fast enough on current devices.
As on the QNAP there is no graphics hardware, VNC will not work (at
least not out of the
Michael Schnell wrote:
On 01/15/2013 12:29 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
I was routinely able to run the server-end of VNC (i.e. the code that
runs on the same machine as the app) on a Slug,
I even do have a Slug for testing (the one that recently was replaced by
the more powerful QNAP)
How
On 01/15/2013 12:29 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
I was routinely able to run the server-end of VNC (i.e. the code that
runs on the same machine as the app) on a Slug,
I even do have a Slug for testing (the one that recently was replaced by
the more powerful QNAP)
How did you install the VNC
Michael Schnell wrote:
On 01/15/2013 12:01 PM, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
Do it on the device. Either directly or remote via NX, VNC or even
X-forwarding is fast enough on current devices.
As on the QNAP there is no graphics hardware, VNC will not work (at
least not out of the box). It needs a Frame
On 01/15/2013 12:07 PM, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
sudo apt-get install fpc and sudo apt-get install lazarus
Nice if the system has apt...
For the QNAP NAS (that runs a slightly tuned Linux distribution) there
only is qpkg (by QNAP themselves) and ipkg (by Optware). Both worlds
don't offer fpc or
On 01/15/2013 12:01 PM, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
Do it on the device. Either directly or remote via NX, VNC or even
X-forwarding is fast enough on current devices.
As on the QNAP there is no graphics hardware, VNC will not work (at
least not out of the box). It needs a Frame buffer RAM and if there
Hi,
On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 11:05 +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> Sven Barth wrote:
>
> >> "Cross-compile app every time"
> >>
> >> is easier/better than
> >>
> >> "Compile cross compiler once and work natively as of then"
> >>
> >> ?
> >>
> >> That is a weird assumption. I would go for the secon
Am 15.01.2013 12:06, schrieb Thomas Schatzl:
Hi,
There are so many options at the moment, so actually it's the other
way round, there's so *much* choice that it's hard to find the most
suitable one for a given price point if you search a little.
forgot to add the "Chromebook" as a more we
Hi,
On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 12:00 +0100, Michael Schnell wrote:
> On 01/15/2013 11:52 AM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> > I would go for the second one, hands down...
> >
> I see.
>
> Thanks (I'll come back when I seem to be unable to cross-compile the
> compiler or install it on the target ;-) )
Am 15.01.2013 12:01, schrieb Michael Van Canneyt:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 15.01.2013 11:52, schrieb Michael Van Canneyt:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 01/15/2013 11:22 AM, Henry Vermaak wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:45:29AM +0100, Michael Schnell w
Hi,
> There are so many options at the moment, so actually it's the other
> way round, there's so *much* choice that it's hard to find the most
> suitable one for a given price point if you search a little.
>
forgot to add the "Chromebook" as a more well-known option of course.
Thomas
Sven Barth wrote:
"Cross-compile app every time"
is easier/better than
"Compile cross compiler once and work natively as of then"
?
That is a weird assumption. I would go for the second one, hands down...
I wouldn't if the second one is significantly slower than the first one.
Otherwise I
Hi,
On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 10:45 +0100, Michael Schnell wrote:
> On 01/14/2013 08:31 PM, Paul Breneman wrote:
> >
> > This "embedded" thread you started recently has been great. I've
> > tried to keep up with how you are using (or hoping to use) FPC on
> > headless embedded systems for years now
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 15.01.2013 11:52, schrieb Michael Van Canneyt:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 01/15/2013 11:22 AM, Henry Vermaak wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:45:29AM +0100, Michael Schnell wrote:
(c) seems the most appropriate way to allow
On 01/15/2013 11:52 AM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
I would go for the second one, hands down...
I see.
Thanks (I'll come back when I seem to be unable to cross-compile the
compiler or install it on the target ;-) ).
-Michael
___
fpc-devel mailli
Am 15.01.2013 11:52, schrieb Michael Van Canneyt:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 01/15/2013 11:22 AM, Henry Vermaak wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:45:29AM +0100, Michael Schnell wrote:
(c) seems the most appropriate way to allow for decent debugging
performance, but seemi
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 01/15/2013 11:22 AM, Henry Vermaak wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:45:29AM +0100, Michael Schnell wrote:
(c) seems the most appropriate way to allow for decent debugging
performance, but seemingly nobody yet decently tried (or wrote
instructio
SkyDiablo wrote:
hi ho,
i'm back again ;) i have try this:
http://www.mail-archive.com/fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org/msg27336.html
but my Ubuntu Desktop 12.04 LTS can't run the "ppcmips" binary?
$ chmod +x ppcmips
$ ./ppcmips -iV
bash: ./ppcmips: Kann die Datei nicht ausführen. (Can't run th
On 01/15/2013 11:22 AM, Henry Vermaak wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:45:29AM +0100, Michael Schnell wrote:
(c) seems the most appropriate way to allow for decent debugging
performance, but seemingly nobody yet decently tried (or wrote
instructions to) to get Lazarus running remote gdb via TCP
Michael Schnell wrote:
There are different ways to use FPC (and Lazarus) to design and test
"embedded" projects for "headless" hardware.
Using a PC to do the biggest part of the software locally, as I
described in my original post seems to be commonly agreed upon.
But how to debug and finet
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:45:29AM +0100, Michael Schnell wrote:
> (c) seems the most appropriate way to allow for decent debugging
> performance, but seemingly nobody yet decently tried (or wrote
> instructions to) to get Lazarus running remote gdb via TCP/IP.
One of the options in the lazarus de
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 02:04:20AM +0100, SkyDiablo wrote:
> hi ho,
>
> i'm back again ;) i have try this:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org/msg27336.html
>
> but my Ubuntu Desktop 12.04 LTS can't run the "ppcmips" binary?
Ubuntu has a MIPS port? Even for LTS!?
>
>
hi ho,
i'm back again ;) i have try this:
http://www.mail-archive.com/fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org/msg27336.html
but my Ubuntu Desktop 12.04 LTS can't run the "ppcmips" binary?
$ chmod +x ppcmips
$ ./ppcmips -iV
bash: ./ppcmips: Kann die Datei nicht ausführen. (Can't run this file)
so, if t
On 01/14/2013 08:31 PM, Paul Breneman wrote:
This "embedded" thread you started recently has been great. I've
tried to keep up with how you are using (or hoping to use) FPC on
headless embedded systems for years now. Thanks, and please continue
to keep us in the feedback loop!
Hmm. Unfortun
32 matches
Mail list logo
