I looked at http://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,21223.0.html
There's a significant performance drop in fpc trunk
The difference of generated code is a call to fpc_ansistr_assign and a
different implementation of fpc_AnsiStr_Concat
AFAIK there should be significant performance
20.06.2013 16:15, luiz americo pereira camara пишет:
I looked at http://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,21223.0.html
There's a significant performance drop in fpc trunk
The difference of generated code is a call to fpc_ansistr_assign and a
different implementation of
2013/6/20 Sergei Gorelkin sergei_gorel...@mail.ru:
20.06.2013 16:15, luiz americo pereira camara пишет:
I looked at
http://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,21223.0.html
There's a significant performance drop in fpc trunk
Is there anything wrong or this is the expected result?
20.06.2013 19:31, luiz americo pereira camara пишет:
Maybe in that example there's going an (unneeded) conversion?
This is possible. One needs to profile the example to tell for sure.
Regards,
Sergei
___
fpc-devel maillist -
I have mostly given up on creating the cross compiler for MIPSEB-OpenWrt
(or DD-WRT) platform.
Now, my plan B is to create a cross compiler (from x86 Linux) to
ARM-Raspberry Pi
I know the default raspberry pi os is Raspbian which is a version of
debian. If possible, I'd like to get a binutils
You should better install the native port of lazarus freepascal on the
raspberry and connect the machine to a display/mouse/keyboard. Install
latest raspian from http://www.raspberrypi.org/downloads
and here's a user-guide for installing lazarus/fpc:
http://elinux.org/Lazarus_on_RPi
Then
Thanks.
I already successfully install Lazarus/FPC 2.6 on raspbian :-)
If you say cross compiling and debugging is not worth the trouble, I
will take your advice.
Dennis
Michael Ring wrote:
You should better install the native port of lazarus freepascal on
the raspberry and connect the
