On 8/23/2013 20:45, Steve Smith wrote:
On 23/08/13 20:41, Sven Barth wrote:
"Here's some code, assemble it, and be quick about it johnny!"
Was that a Short Circuit reference? O.o
Once again in English please. I just don't understand that last sentence at all.
Sorry.
Short Circuit movie - J
On 23/08/13 21:50, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Quite frankly, from what I've seen most Windows users would find Linux
simpler than one of the *freely* *available* IBM OSes (i.e. MVS, VM/360
"sixpack" and so on).
To avoid ambiguity: that was a typo, and I meant "VM/370 's
On 23/08/13 20:41, Sven Barth wrote:
Firstly, I am not necessarily proposing that we don't concentrate on
Linux initially, in fact it makes a certain amount of sense (In a
perverted way :)) My EXAMPLES concentrate on MVS because that's my
background.
I don't see what would be perverted about t
On 25/08/2013 14:11, Paul Ishenin wrote:
25.08.13, 20:44, Martin пишет:
To find some info I added debugln as follows.
Note the part
PInteger(ASource)[0], // just some part of the string, for verification
PInteger(ASource)[1], // on 2.7.1 Encoding ? // on 2.6.2 length
argh 1 ... a mistake,
25.08.13, 20:44, Martin пишет:
To find some info I added debugln as follows.
Note the part
PInteger(ASource)[0], // just some part of the string, for verification
PInteger(ASource)[1], // on 2.7.1 Encoding ? // on 2.6.2 length
PInteger(ASource)[-2] // on 2.7.1 length // on 2.6.2 ref coun
I suspect this to be an issue with the new 2.7.1 encoding. If someone
could please review...
Some background fist.
I was looking into a report of a user, where the IDE (Lazarus) would not
show the debug-line-info (blue dots in gutter), for some files (but work
for others)
fpc svn 25364
lazaru
