Re: [fpc-devel] Re: fpc-devel Digest, Vol 112, Issue 32

2013-08-26 Thread Sven Barth
Am 26.08.2013 19:45 schrieb "Mark Morgan Lloyd" < markmll.fpc-de...@telemetry.co.uk>: > Of course, if I weren't bone idle I'd have investigated whether FPC has the ability to target the kernel module format, although I'm fairly sure that nobody's tried it on SPARC before now. It's a bit dusted, bu

Re: [fpc-devel] Re: fpc-devel Digest, Vol 112, Issue 32

2013-08-26 Thread Mark Morgan Lloyd
Steve wrote: >> We can agree on that at least, although I must say that C has >> improved a lot since K&R days. I'm afraid I can't agree on that one. I think it's fair to say that nobody here /likes/ C, otherwise he'd not be working on Pascal. But a few weeks ago I had to knock together a

Re: [fpc-devel] Compiling for libgdb, and using make -j on larger SPARC systems

2013-08-26 Thread Sven Barth
Am 26.08.2013 14:38, schrieb Jonas Maebe: On 26 Aug 2013, at 14:34, Sven Barth wrote: Take your time. A few hours/days more or less won't hurt and at least we already know a fix for the resulting problem, but I'd also like to fix the cause :) It's already fixed in trunk in r19338 No, the fi

Re: [fpc-devel] Compiling for libgdb, and using make -j on larger SPARC systems

2013-08-26 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 26 Aug 2013, at 14:34, Sven Barth wrote: Take your time. A few hours/days more or less won't hurt and at least we already know a fix for the resulting problem, but I'd also like to fix the cause :) It's already fixed in trunk in r19338 Jonas

Re: [fpc-devel] Compiling for libgdb, and using make -j on larger SPARC systems

2013-08-26 Thread Sven Barth
Am 26.08.2013 14:11, schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd: Sven Barth wrote: Am 26.08.2013 11:55, schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd: Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: Sven Barth wrote: Would it help if I were to build a cross-compiler here and try building the IDE both with and without libgdb? It would help more if

Re: [fpc-devel] Compiling for libgdb, and using make -j on larger SPARC systems

2013-08-26 Thread Mark Morgan Lloyd
Sven Barth wrote: Am 26.08.2013 11:55, schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd: Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: Sven Barth wrote: Would it help if I were to build a cross-compiler here and try building the IDE both with and without libgdb? It would help more if you'd be able to reduce the problem from "compil

Re: [fpc-devel] Compiling for libgdb, and using make -j on larger SPARC systems

2013-08-26 Thread Sven Barth
Am 26.08.2013 11:55, schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd: Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: Sven Barth wrote: Would it help if I were to build a cross-compiler here and try building the IDE both with and without libgdb? It would help more if you'd be able to reduce the problem from "compile IDE with libgdb"

[fpc-devel] Lazarus 1.0.12 Release

2013-08-26 Thread Mattias Gaertner
The Lazarus team is glad to announce the release of Lazarus 1.0.12. This is a bug fix release, built with fpc 2.6.2. The previous releases 1.0.8 and 1.0.10 were built with fpc 2.6.2 too, while release 1.0.6 was built with fpc 2.6.0. Here is the list of changes for Lazarus and Free Pascal: http:/

Re: [fpc-devel] Compiling for libgdb, and using make -j on larger SPARC systems

2013-08-26 Thread Mark Morgan Lloyd
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: Sven Barth wrote: Would it help if I were to build a cross-compiler here and try building the IDE both with and without libgdb? It would help more if you'd be able to reduce the problem from "compile IDE with libgdb" to "compile this simple unit/program". Thus could

Re: [fpc-devel] Re: fpc-devel Digest, Vol 112, Issue 32

2013-08-26 Thread Sven Barth
Am 26.08.2013 00:57 schrieb "Steve Smith" : There's also the issue of the assembler reader (used, if I understand things correctly, to parse inline assembler mostly in the lower-level > > >>> bits of the RTL). This seems to cause almost as much problem during > >>> development as the asse