On Wed, November 6, 2013 08:45, Andrea Mauri wrote:
> any hint?
> should I have to open a bug report?
Yes, I think so (although I have no clue regarding compatibility with
Delphi, etc.) - looking at the implementation of OrBits (and also
XorBits), the calculation which bits should be used is diffe
On 03 Nov 2013, at 07:40, Max Nazhalov wrote:
Attached final patch that fixes compilation for JVM target (mantis
#25267).
It combines previous two + fix of the runtime error during
application startup.
Now an example http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpc/branches/jvmbackend/tests/test/jvm/tran
Am 06.11.2013 15:06, schrieb Martin:
The below compiles. (2.6.2)
It shows that the value identifier of an enum, can be reached via a
lot of different pathes.
Just want to be sure they are all intentional?
unit Unit1;
{$mode objfpc}{$H+}
interface
uses Classes, SysUtils;
type TEnum = (e1,
If you send a minimal test-case and actual results you might have a
better chance at getting a reply...
Below a sample test project.
I create a TBits (b1) and then I set 16 bits as 1. Then I create 2 TBits
(b2 and b3) with size 164, I use .OrBits to OR b1 with b2 and b3. I
expect that b2
The below compiles. (2.6.2)
It shows that the value identifier of an enum, can be reached via a lot
of different pathes.
Just want to be sure they are all intentional?
unit Unit1;
{$mode objfpc}{$H+}
interface
uses Classes, SysUtils;
type TEnum = (e1,e2,e3);
var en1: TEnum;
implementat
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:45 AM, Andrea Mauri wrote:
> any hint?
> should I have to open a bug report?
>
> Il 31/10/2013 16:23, Andrea Mauri ha scritto:
>>
>> Dear All,
>> I am using TBits object but I found some errors using it. Before adding
>> a bugreport to the bugtracker I would be sure that t
