Sven Barth schrieb:
Hello together!
I've now finished my Proof of Concept ARC implementation which is based
on the RFC I published a few weeks back:
http://lists.freepascal.org/fpc-devel/2014-September/034263.html
Fine :-)
To recap:
[...]
- a class instance is destroyed once the reference
Hello together!
I've now finished my Proof of Concept ARC implementation which is based
on the RFC I published a few weeks back:
http://lists.freepascal.org/fpc-devel/2014-September/034263.html
To recap:
- there are no reference counted classes by default, but reference
counting can be intro
I didn't knew about that! This can be very helpful for generating C
compatible interfaces for DLLs.
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Michael Van Canneyt <
mich...@freepascal.org> wrote:
>
> See the FPC sources:
>
> packages/fcl-passrc/examples/test_parser.pp
>
> Michael.
>
>
> On Thu, 23 Oct 201
On 10/24/2014 03:32 PM, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
On 10/24/2014 12:39 AM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 23/10/14 17:16, Vsevolod Alekseyev wrote:
There's no separate makefile for fpcmake alone, is there?
It used to be as simple as going into utils/fpcm and performing a "make
all", but with the new F
On 10/24/2014 12:39 AM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 23/10/14 17:16, Vsevolod Alekseyev wrote:
There's no separate makefile for fpcmake alone, is there?
It used to be as simple as going into utils/fpcm and performing a "make
all", but with the new FPC-based build system I think that is
unfortunately
On 24 Oct 2014, at 14:29, Marco van de Voort wrote:
Btw, afaik running make in utils/fpcm would only work if you had
reached
fcl-base, since you need those include dirs.
It worked because the release compiler would use its own fcl-base units.
Jonas_
In our previous episode, Jonas Maebe said:
> The question here was about implementing a new target in FPC and then
> regenerating the makefiles for that new target. This requires an fpcmake
> built from the trunk sources.
Yes, I thought it was the common missing fpcmake during the install stage,
s
