Re: [fpc-devel] fpc iso mode

In our previous episode, Sven Barth said: > > Yeah, that's a thought I had as well. Then again those two modes are > probably only going to be used by people who know what they're doing... :/ Btw, ISO is not in -h, not even in trunk. ___ fpc-devel

Re: [fpc-devel] Panel Top Negative Limitation.

Am 04.02.2016 10:48 schrieb : > > Hi > I have a problem using a panel, that is large say 7. > If I try to bring areas of this into the view area by using panel.top:=-avalue, this works fine until you hit –32769; at which point the panel vanishes. > How can this be

[fpc-devel] Panel Top Negative Limitation.

Hi I have a problem using a panel, that is large say 7. If I try to bring areas of this into the view area by using panel.top:=-avalue, this works fine until you hit –32769; at which point the panel vanishes. How can this be corrected; or is there a workaround? I have a forum thread; where I

Re: [fpc-devel] ifthen bugs (maybe)

On 04/02/16 05:22, Martin wrote: //writeln(b in ifthen( true , [1,2] , [3.4])); // internal error Maybe that's not related to the fact that you use ifthen, but because you have [3.4] instead of [3,4]? Jonas ___ fpc-devel maillist -

Re: [fpc-devel] fpc iso mode

Am 03.02.2016 um 22:38 schrieb Sven Barth: > On 03.02.2016 20:07, Tomas Hajny wrote: >> On Wed, February 3, 2016 20:00, Sven Barth wrote: >>> On 03.02.2016 16:58, Schindler Karl-Michael wrote: >> . >> . How about his suggestion about renaming the mode to iso7185? Too late? >>> >>> We could

Re: [fpc-devel] fpc iso mode

> Am 04.02.2016 um 02:40 schrieb fpc-devel-requ...@lists.freepascal.org: > > Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 20:00:11 +0100 > From: Sven Barth > Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] fpc iso mode > Message-ID: <56b24e3b.4040...@googlemail.com> > >>> It looks good now, the differences are