Am 30.06.2016 02:01 schrieb "Max Nazhalov" :
>
>
> Wed, 29 Jun 2016 03:32:35 +0200, Sven Barth:
> >
> > And the tagging and building of 3.0.2 should start soon (TM).
> >
>
> Is there any chance that bug#0030240 will be fixed/merged?
Considering that it is not even fixed in trunk yet that's not ver
Wed, 29 Jun 2016 03:32:35 +0200, Sven Barth:
>
> And the tagging and building of 3.0.2 should start soon (TM).
>
Is there any chance that bug#0030240 will be fixed/merged?
---
WBR, Max.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://
On 28/06/2016 04:55, Russ Davies wrote:
Hi,
My local time zone is GMT +2, and have noticed that with V3.0.0, that
the LocalTimeToUniversal() function is adding the offset instead of
subtracting it:
FPC 3.0.0 produces incorrect results.
FPC 3.0.1 r34023 and FPC 3.1.1 r34024 produce correct r
El 29/06/2016 a las 22:35, vfclists . escribió:
Does this have to do with some questionable Microsoft formulae which
prompted this query -
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2779948/subroutine-to-apply-daylight-bias-to-display-time-in-local-dst
Hello,
Only Now() can be converted to UTC using
On 29 June 2016 at 19:51, wrote:
> On 06/29/2016 12:09 PM, Henry Vermaak wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:56:30AM +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>>
>>> FPC 3.0 indeed contains a bug. This has meanwhile been fixed.
>>>
>>> If I compile the program with trunk, I get:
>>>
>>> home: >fpc tt.
On 06/29/2016 01:51 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 29.06.2016 17:16 schrieb :
> ok, thanks! that's what i've used this time... can i assume that 3.0.0 should
> also be used to build trunk?
That is correct.
thanks!
--
NOTE: No off-list assistance is given without prior approval.
*Please ke
On 06/29/2016 12:09 PM, Henry Vermaak wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:56:30AM +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
FPC 3.0 indeed contains a bug. This has meanwhile been fixed.
If I compile the program with trunk, I get:
home: >fpc tt.pp
home: >./tt
Offset :-120
Local Time :10:53:16
UTC
Am 29.06.2016 17:16 schrieb :
>
> On 06/29/2016 10:13 AM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
>>
>> In our previous episode, wkitt...@windstream.net said:
>>>
>>> which starting compiler should be used to build fixes_3_0? 2.6.4 or
3.0.0?
>>
>>
>> A complete install (with all utilities) of the last release, s
On 29/6/2016 7:09 μμ, Henry Vermaak wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:56:30AM +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
FPC 3.0 indeed contains a bug. This has meanwhile been fixed.
If I compile the program with trunk, I get:
home: >fpc tt.pp
home: >./tt
Offset :-120
Local Time :10:53:16
UTC
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:56:30AM +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> FPC 3.0 indeed contains a bug. This has meanwhile been fixed.
>
> If I compile the program with trunk, I get:
>
> home: >fpc tt.pp
> home: >./tt
> Offset :-120
> Local Time :10:53:16
> UTC:08:53:16
> home: >date --
On 06/29/2016 10:13 AM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, wkitt...@windstream.net said:
which starting compiler should be used to build fixes_3_0? 2.6.4 or 3.0.0?
A complete install (with all utilities) of the last release, so 3.0.0
ok, thanks! that's what i've used this tim
wkitty42 wrote on Wed, 29 Jun 2016:
On 06/20/2016 11:02 AM, wkitt...@windstream.net wrote:
i cannot find binaries of:
x86_64-linux-ppcx64 for fpc 2.6.4
x86_64-linux-ppcx64 for fpc 3.0.0
i've looked in
ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/dist/2.6.4/bootstrap/
ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub
On 06/20/2016 11:02 AM, wkitt...@windstream.net wrote:
i cannot find binaries of:
x86_64-linux-ppcx64 for fpc 2.6.4
x86_64-linux-ppcx64 for fpc 3.0.0
i've looked in
ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/dist/2.6.4/bootstrap/
ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/dist/3.0.0/bootstrap/
help??
In our previous episode, wkitt...@windstream.net said:
> which starting compiler should be used to build fixes_3_0? 2.6.4 or 3.0.0?
A complete install (with all utilities) of the last release, so 3.0.0
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepasca
which starting compiler should be used to build fixes_3_0? 2.6.4 or 3.0.0?
--
NOTE: No off-list assistance is given without prior approval.
*Please keep mailing list traffic on the list* unless
private contact is specifically requested and granted.
__
15 matches
Mail list logo