2017-01-19 10:44 GMT+01:00 Michael Van Canneyt :
>
> At the risk of writing nonsense:
>
Seems ok to me :)
>
> I would think that a method name should give a clue as to what it actually
> does.
> In that sense AddRef/Clone seems better to me ?
> (unless Copy does something else besides increasing
On Thu, 19 Jan 2017, Maciej Izak wrote:
Hi,
in patch/feature proposed in http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=30687
we have Copy/Clone operators naming convention proposed by Florian (my
initial idea was AddRef/Copy).
I'd like to say that Copy/Clone naming convention is terrible in practic
Hi,
in patch/feature proposed in http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=30687
we have Copy/Clone operators naming convention proposed by Florian (my
initial idea was AddRef/Copy).
I'd like to say that Copy/Clone naming convention is terrible in practical
usage. :( As the main author I have many t
