Would code like this be correct?
Procedure FillWord(var x; count: SizeInt; value: Word); assembler; nostackframe;
asm
{ win64: rcx dest, rdx count, r8w value
linux: rdi dest, rsi count, dx value }
{$ifdef win64}
push%rdi
.seh_pushreg %rdi
.seh_endprologue
cmp $0x0, %rdx
..
Ooh right, okay. Thanks for that Sergei. I just put it in somewhat blindly
because the compiler inserts it
for Pascal code after the normal prologue after creating a stack frame, but
complained and threw an error if
I used .seh_pushreg but then neglected to use .seh_endprologue. I agree that
On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 20:08 +0100, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
> Am 25.11.2017 um 22:19 schrieb Christo:
> >
> > On Sat, 2017-11-25 at 18:27 +0100, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
> > >
> > > What happens if you compile them with -CX?
> > Same problem.
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Is there a way to instruct t
29.11.2017 15:12, J. Gareth Moreton wrote:
Thanks Christo.
Apologies for 4 messages coming in at once. I think there were a few technical
glitches with the mailing
list. Either way, I have submitted an updated patch to the bug report in
question that corrects the stack
unwinding for Window
Thanks Christo.
Apologies for 4 messages coming in at once. I think there were a few technical
glitches with the mailing
list. Either way, I have submitted an updated patch to the bug report in
question that corrects the stack
unwinding for Windows. Any testing would be greatly appreciated
