Am 22.01.2018 um 21:35 schrieb Christo:
> On Sat, 2018-01-06 at 16:03 +0100, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
>> Am 05.01.2018 um 11:24 schrieb Christo:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 2018-01-03 at 18:10 +0100, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
Am 03.01.2018 um 15:48 schrieb Christo:
> Is there a better location in the
Am 19.01.2018 um 21:08 schrieb J. Gareth Moreton:
> Hi everyone,
>
> So unless anyone has any objections, I would like to start experimenting to
> implement a feature that allows
> for per-type data alignment. The main purpose for this is to better support
> x86-64 SIMD extensions, where
> al
On Sat, 2018-01-06 at 16:03 +0100, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
> Am 05.01.2018 um 11:24 schrieb Christo:
> >
> > On Wed, 2018-01-03 at 18:10 +0100, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
> > >
> > > Am 03.01.2018 um 15:48 schrieb Christo:
> > > > Is there a better location in the compiler to implement some assembler
2018-01-22 18:48 GMT+01:00 Mattias Gaertner :
> On Mon, 22 Jan 2018 18:45:57 +0100
> Maciej Izak wrote:
> > Correct. There was some topic about "static class methods" and "class
> > property" some time ago on fpc-devel or in fpc-pascal. For example static
> > class methods can be used as callback
On Mon, 22 Jan 2018 18:45:57 +0100
Maciej Izak wrote:
> 2018-01-22 18:25 GMT+01:00 Denis Kozlov :
>
> > I presume then there is no way for having a class property who's returned
> > value can be dynamically changed in child classes? In other words, class
> > property getters/setters can only be
2018-01-22 18:25 GMT+01:00 Denis Kozlov :
> I presume then there is no way for having a class property who's returned
> value can be dynamically changed in child classes? In other words, class
> property getters/setters can only be implemented by the class that declared
> the property.
>
Correct.
On 22/01/2018 17:09, Maciej Izak wrote:
This was bug, fixed in trunk (see my rev. 35724)
Thank you for pointing that out.
I presume then there is no way for having a class property who's
returned value can be dynamically changed in child classes? In other
words, class property getters/sette
2018-01-22 18:00 GMT+01:00 Denis Kozlov :
> Can static class methods be virtual?
>
This was bug, fixed in trunk (see my rev. 35724)
--
Best regards,
Maciej Izak
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-
Hello,
Can static class methods be virtual?
According to the FPC documentation, static class methods cannot be
virtual, as stated here:
https://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/ref/refsu30.html
But in practice, FPC compiles and executes virtual and overridden static
class methods just fine.
Th
