Am Mi., 5. Dez. 2018, 00:06 hat J. Gareth Moreton
geschrieben:
> The more you learn! What is TLS, curiously? Given that I do a lot of my
> work at the assembler level, I figure this is something I should know!
>
Thread Local Storage. For ELF they are pseudo instructions that the
assembler needs
Not sure if this was intended for the group mailing list or not, but was
only e-mailed to me.
One quesion though... in your example, what level of your optimisation are
you compiling under? I thought the peephole optimizer already changes
things like "lea (%ecx,%eax),%eax" to "add %ecx,%eax". N
The more you learn! What is TLS, curiously? Given that I do a lot of my
work at the assembler level, I figure this is something I should know!
Gareth
On Tue 04/12/18 22:48 , Simon Kissel simon.kis...@nerdherrschaft.com sent:
Hi Florian,
> Do you compile with -Aas? The internal assemblers
Hi Florian,
> Do you compile with -Aas? The internal assemblers do not support TLS yet,
> this is WIP.
Ah wow! -Aas does indeed help. Both the assembler errors and
the internal error are gone, both in Linux i386 and ARM.
And the created binaries even work. Nice! Thank you!
Cheers,
Simon
Am 04.12.2018 um 02:16 schrieb Simon Kissel:
> Hi Florian,
>
>
>
> we are currently to try to do some real-life benchmarks with our
> products, however with rev. 40346 compilation fails with the two following
> showstoppers:
Do you compile with -Aas? The internal assemblers do not support TLS yet
At the moment I'm trying to fix some Linux bugs. When I compile Lazarus
with it, I get about a 5% speed increase for -O1 and a 15% speed increase
for -O3, but someone else reported a 2% slowdown for -O2 on their own test
project. Either way, I hope my fundamental theory is sound... reducing
the
Hi Gareth,
> A regression like this is quite serious. I'd recommend opening a
> bug report with a reproducible case so we can investigate and hopefully fix
> it within the day.
created a test project, and opened two tickets:
https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=34646
https://bugs.freepascal
On 03/12/18 13:58, Martin wrote:
Posts by "bigDan":
http://forum.lazarus-ide.org/index.php/topic,42869.msg303599.html#msg303599
The log he provided shows that
- lldb got a "thread step-over"
- lldb believed to have stopped at the end of step-over (not any other
reason): "stop reason = step over
