> I'm interested in starting (or joining) a discussion on the next (*non*
> backwards compatible) version of FPC.
Did you take a look at Oxygen (RemObjects Elements) ?
-Michael
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.fre
That's an interesting project there.
One thing that does spring to mind though.,, what features of Delphi and
FPC made the language unsuitable for Martin Schreiber, and is it anything
we developers can possibly address in some way?
Gareth aka. Kit
On Fri 15/02/19 20:32 , Jonas Maebe jo...@fr
On 15/02/19 06:28, James via fpc-devel wrote:
I'm interested in starting (or joining) a discussion on the next (*non*
backwards compatible) version of FPC.
As mentioned by others, that's not really something any of the current
FPC developers are interested in working on. Martin Schreiber, howe
El 15/2/19 a les 12:27, J. Gareth Moreton ha escrit:
I dare say, I would consider elevating this, especially as it's a
feature being used by an end user and is pretty serious if a
multi-threaded program can sometimes freeze due to a race hazard.
The problem is, as I said before, I cannot repro
I dare say, I would consider elevating this, especially as it's a feature
being used by an end user and is pretty serious if a multi-threaded program
can sometimes freeze due to a race hazard.
Unfortunately, I don't use threads enough to know for sure how the
underlying classes work, otherwise I
El 6/2/19 a les 18:51, Sven Barth via fpc-devel ha escrit:
Would you nevertheless try with 3.2, please? Just in case it happens to
be the problem I had fixed in regards to Queue().
With fpc from the fixes_3_2 branch, revision 41310, and lazarus from the
fixes_2_0 branch revision 60414 it ha
I can't speak for the senior developers, but I think there's a preference
that backwards compatibility is maintained, at least between versions of
FPC if not Delphi. At least my preference is to attempt to better support
the existing FPC - for example, I tend to do a lot of work and research
into
Am Fr., 15. Feb. 2019, 10:07 hat James via fpc-devel <
fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org> geschrieben:
> I'm interested in starting (or joining) a discussion on the next (*non*
> backwards compatible) version of FPC. Instead of being classically object
> oriented, there is merit in examining a model
I'm interested in starting (or joining) a discussion on the next (*non*
backwards compatible) version of FPC. Instead of being classically object
oriented, there is merit in examining a model with ad-hoc polymorphism like
Rust.
Strongest features of Pascal (in my opinion):
1. Code readability
