Hi everyone,
Jonas and I were talking today through e-mail and he mentioned on #35346
the following interesting point:
"An inline directive in the implementation but not in the interface should
be rejected by the compiler, because it changes the interface crc. I know
it does not do that current
Aah, fair enough. Thanks.
On Mon 22/04/19 12:57 , "Jonas Maebe" jo...@freepascal.org sent:
On 22/04/2019 12:52, J. Gareth Moreton wrote:
>> [ https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=34772 [1] ]
> who is the maintainer in this instance?
Sergei Gorelkin (the author of the other patch)
On 22/04/2019 12:52, J. Gareth Moreton wrote:
>> [ https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=34772 ]
who is the maintainer in this instance?
Sergei Gorelkin (the author of the other patch) is the maintainer of the
SEH functionality.
Jonas
___
fpc-d
Sorry for sounding dumb... who is the maintainer in this instance? Is it
Martin Friebe, the person who raised the original issue? The person who
commissioned me was someone else entirely, and I think I got their
attention because I bumped the priority level up back in December. They
are perfectl
On 22/04/2019 08:10, J. Gareth Moreton wrote:
The question is this... what's the policy when there are two vastly
different patches on offer that fix the same bug (and which cannot
really be merged together)? The bounty has already been resolved
separately, so it's just a matter of what gets m
Heh, it was clear in my head at the time, but not on paper!
The question is this... what's the policy when there are two vastly
different patches on offer that fix the same bug (and which cannot really
be merged together)? The bounty has already been resolved separately, so
it's just a matter of
