Question about the compiler. When you parse a function like this:
DoThis('string');
The parameter is a tdef with the name “Constant String” and there is no typesym
(which I need to specialize the function). How should I get a typesym for the
tdef in the case of constants? Do I need to search th
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 1:51 PM Sven Barth via fpc-devel <
fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org> wrote:
> The code changes themselves are okay and that was all I promised to
> review. The problem is I personally don't care about the feature, so other
> core devs should give their okay for the feature its
Michael Van Canneyt schrieb am Mo., 7. Okt. 2019,
17:21:
>
>
> On Mon, 7 Oct 2019, Ben Grasset wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Oct 5, 2019 at 1:37 PM Ryan Joseph wrote:
> >
> >> I can’t remember what Bens patch did using compiler directives but I
> like
> >> the Java idea of using the column of the opening
> On Oct 7, 2019, at 11:10 AM, Ben Grasset wrote:
>
> As far as "approval", if I recall correctly Sven said he intended to review
> it eventually.
>
Excellent. I’ve already had multiple times I could have used this. Who can we
bribe? ;)
Regards,
Ryan Joseph
__
On Mon, 7 Oct 2019, Ben Grasset wrote:
On Sat, Oct 5, 2019 at 1:37 PM Ryan Joseph wrote:
I can’t remember what Bens patch did using compiler directives but I like
the Java idea of using the column of the opening string character as the
reference point for indentation. Seems easier.
Did the
On Sat, Oct 5, 2019 at 1:37 PM Ryan Joseph wrote:
> I can’t remember what Bens patch did using compiler directives but I like
> the Java idea of using the column of the opening string character as the
> reference point for indentation. Seems easier.
>
> Did the FPC team even approve this idea yet
