On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 12:07 PM Sven Barth via fpc-devel
wrote:
> I'm against it. It would essentially mean that you can't use the same
> field for the setter or that you'd need to go through a method.
> Exchanging one restriction (can't use a base class for the property) for
> another (can't use
Am 30.05.2020 um 14:28 schrieb Sven Barth:
Am 30.05.2020 um 12:33 schrieb Yuriy Sydorov:
On 29.05.2020 22:36, Sven Barth via fpc-devel wrote:
Am 27.05.2020 um 00:41 schrieb Yuriy Sydorov:
On 27.05.2020 1:01, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Op 26-05-2020 om 23:36 schreef Yuriy Sydorov:
Does it hap
Am 04.06.2020 um 03:45 schrieb Kostas Michalopoulos via fpc-devel:
Hello,
I'd like to add a small feature for property getters to allow
themselves be exposed as a base type of the real field. Example:
===
program ExposeDerivedAsBase;
{$mode objfpc}
type
TBase = class
end;
TDerived = cl
