Hi,
in Windows which cross tools / toolchain for avr should I use ? FPC's
avr-embedded- ( from
https://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpcbuild/binaries/i386-win32 ) or
Microchip's AVR Toolchain for Windows (
https://www.microchip.com/en-us/development-tools-tools-and-software/gcc-compilers-avr-a
Hi,
Στις 3/2/2021 10:06 μ.μ., ο/η Florian Klämpfl via fpc-devel έγραψε:
Am 02.02.21 um 11:24 schrieb Dimitrios Chr. Ioannidis via fpc-devel:
Hi,
while I investigate some problems I'm having regarding avr
debugging, I noticed that the dwarf 2 / 3 generation gives a warning
when I call a pr
Am 03.02.21 um 22:36 schrieb J. Gareth Moreton via fpc-devel:
On 03/02/2021 21:18, Florian Klämpfl via fpc-devel wrote:
Am 03.02.21 um 22:14 schrieb J. Gareth Moreton via fpc-devel:
Rats, I might have messed up with some of the arithmetic, as well as
the dangers of crossing bitwise with logical
On 03/02/2021 21:18, Florian Klämpfl via fpc-devel wrote:
Am 03.02.21 um 22:14 schrieb J. Gareth Moreton via fpc-devel:
Rats, I might have messed up with some of the arithmetic, as well as
the dangers of crossing bitwise with logical Boolean operations,
although some combinations still work - i
Am 03.02.21 um 22:14 schrieb J. Gareth Moreton via fpc-devel:
Rats, I might have messed up with some of the arithmetic, as well as the
dangers of crossing bitwise with logical Boolean operations, although
some combinations still work - if the conditions are "x = 0" rather than
"x <> 0" in the e
Rats, I might have messed up with some of the arithmetic, as well as the
dangers of crossing bitwise with logical Boolean operations, although
some combinations still work - if the conditions are "x = 0" rather than
"x <> 0" in the example:
testq %rbx,%rbx
seteb %al
testq
Am 03.02.21 um 21:23 schrieb Sven Barth via fpc-devel:
Am 03.02.2021 um 20:25 schrieb Florian Klämpfl via fpc-devel:
Am 02.02.21 um 22:06 schrieb J. Gareth Moreton via fpc-devel:
Hi everyone,
I've found a potential optimisation for conditions of the form "(x <>
0) and (y <> 0)", which are ver
Am 03.02.2021 um 20:25 schrieb Florian Klämpfl via fpc-devel:
Am 02.02.21 um 22:06 schrieb J. Gareth Moreton via fpc-devel:
Hi everyone,
I've found a potential optimisation for conditions of the form "(x <>
0) and (y <> 0)", which are very common because this is semantically
equivalent to "As
Am 02.02.21 um 11:24 schrieb Dimitrios Chr. Ioannidis via fpc-devel:
Hi,
while I investigate some problems I'm having regarding avr debugging,
I noticed that the dwarf 2 / 3 generation gives a warning when I call a
procedure from another unit. Is it a bug or because it's a warning I can
sa
Am 02.02.21 um 22:06 schrieb J. Gareth Moreton via fpc-devel:
Hi everyone,
I've found a potential optimisation for conditions of the form "(x <> 0)
and (y <> 0)", which are very common because this is semantically
equivalent to "Assigned(x) and Assigned(y)", for example, and such a
construct
On 02/02/2021 16:48, C Western via fpc-devel wrote:
> I have been trying out compiling my main application for the new Apple
> M1 machines, and have two queries:
>
> The traceback on crashes does not include line numbers, when the same
> flags on other architectures does. Is this something that is
11 matches
Mail list logo
