On 14/08/2023 14:52, Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-devel wrote:
On Mon, 14 Aug 2023, Martin Frb via fpc-devel wrote:
Does "with" take the "address" of the value, and operate on that
address, even if the address of that value could change within the
"with" statement.
You may not do this. It
On Mon, 14 Aug 2023, Martin Frb via fpc-devel wrote:
In the below code, the array is resized (and more important relocated in
mem) inside the function "bar".
The commented line (without "with") works as expected.
The "with" line has a different behaviour. I guess it is by design. Just
want
In the below code, the array is resized (and more important relocated in
mem) inside the function "bar".
The commented line (without "with") works as expected.
The "with" line has a different behaviour. I guess it is by design. Just
wanted to confirm.
The version with "with" prints 12345 for
