[fpc-devel] tests/test/tset6.pp failure

2025-04-25 Thread J. Gareth Moreton via fpc-devel
Hi everyone, I'm curious behind the continuous failure of tests/test/tset6.pp - is it a feature that hasn't been implemented yet or a parser problem? Kit -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com ___ fpc-

Re: [fpc-devel] Test fix

2025-04-25 Thread J. Gareth Moreton via fpc-devel
"Just one small remark: why do you use '$8' instead of simply '8'?" Mostly habit because the tests use "Iteration and 7" to select the index, so I use $8 for the count to indicate that the bitwise nature of it is important. Kit On 25/04/2025 21:31, Pierre Muller via fpc-devel wrote: Hi,  

Re: [fpc-devel] Test fix

2025-04-25 Thread Pierre Muller via fpc-devel
Hi, I add the IN_TESTS conditional code to avoid getting timeout related failures, inside testsuite. I didn't notice that more than one iteration was needed for bfloatfunc.pp, because I tried it with ITERATIONS=1 and it seemed to finish without failure... I have no objection to your patch

[fpc-devel] Test fix

2025-04-25 Thread J. Gareth Moreton via fpc-devel
Hi everyone, I just fixed an issue with tests/bench/bfloatfunc.pp over at https://gitlab.com/freepascal.org/fpc/source/-/merge_requests/996 failing due to the reduced iteration count.  I've increased it from 1 to 8 when in conformance mode (in IN_TESTS defined), since if it's less than that,