Hi Tomas,
On 17-12-14 21:30, Tomas Hajny wrote:
On 17 Dec 14, at 19:27, Dave Parsons wrote:
Hi Dave,
I needed to create an OS/2 DLL today& was disappointed by the compiler
(v2.6.4) telling me that they were not supported.
http://www.freepascal.org/faq.var#os2-dll section 6.3 seem
On 17-12-14 21:08, rpzrpz...@gmail.com wrote:
No disrespect, but, don't you think it is time to retire your OS/2 computer?
No. I use OS/2& Linux daily and until recently OpenVMS& XP also.
Dave
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepasca
Hi,
I needed to create an OS/2 DLL today & was disappointed by the compiler
(v2.6.4) telling me that they were not supported.
http://www.freepascal.org/faq.var#os2-dll section 6.3 seems to agree but is
rather old.
Can anyone confirm that this is still true?
Google didn't find much and it is
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:24:53 +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> I am willing to learn and help. Not having decent debugger support is
> killing me - and I am clearly not alone, as the thread in the Lazarus
> mailing list proves. The problem as far as I can see, is that the Free
> Pascal project is
On Wed, 14 May 2008 23:32:04 +0200 (CEST), Tomas Hajny wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2008 09:05, Dave Parsons wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > For a while now I've been getting the following error when
> > building from svn (2.3.1 from 20 mins ago).
> > The last known go
On Wed, 14 May 2008 12:53:19 -0300, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> You could try this:
>
> http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/How_To_Help_Developing_Lazarus#Dealing_with_regressions
Yes thanks, I have been doing just that.
I started by checking out a new tree of fpc, not fpcbuild which I
Hi,
For a while now I've been getting the following error when
building from svn (2.3.1 from 20 mins ago).
The last known good build I have is from 3rd. Jan but I think
it was ok in Feb also. I build about once a month but don't
always do an install.
I've looked at the change history for all the f
Hi,
I've just updated from SVN and rebuilt the compiler again.
The problem I reported last time appears to be fixed now,
thanks.
'Free Pascal Compiler version 2.3.1 [2008/03/29] for i386'
However, the problem I mentioned last time, but forgot to
detail (sorry), is still there.
It seems to be a c
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:16:24 +0100 (CET), Tomas Hajny wrote:
> On Mon, March 10, 2008 08:58, Dave Parsons wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> > I've just rebuilt the compiler on OS/2 and ran into a new problem.
> >
> > The build stops with the error below if the file it
Hi,
I've just rebuilt the compiler on OS/2 and ran into a new problem.
The build stops with the error below if the file it is trying
to include does not have the archive bit set. It had been cleared
by a recent backup.
If I set the bit manually again, then it is able to read it and
compiles ok.
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:14:25 +0100, Tomas Hajny wrote:
>
> Yes, this looks like a too old version of as.exe.
> What does "as --version" report for you? My
> installation says "GNU assembler 2.14 20030612
> (Innotek Build 2004-02-23 14:15)". I believe that
> this version was already distribute
I sent this yesterday but it still hasn't shown up here yet
so I'll try again. Apologies if anyone receives it twice.
Dave
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 19:55:12 +0100 (CET), Tomas Hajny wrote:
> Dave Parsons wrote:
> > On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 12:12:53 +0100, Vincent Snijders wrote:
> &
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 19:55:12 +0100 (CET), Tomas Hajny wrote:
> Dave Parsons wrote:
> > On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 12:12:53 +0100, Vincent Snijders wrote:
> >> Dave Parsons schreef:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> >> > I've just tried building fpc-2.3.1 from svn using fpc
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 12:12:53 +0100, Vincent Snijders wrote:
> Dave Parsons schreef:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've just tried building fpc-2.3.1 from svn using fpc-2.0.4 and
> > received the following errors.
> Can you start with fpc-2.2.0?
>
No, according to the
Hi,
I've just tried building fpc-2.3.1 from svn using fpc-2.0.4 and
received the following errors.
classes.inc(1131,3) Error: Procedure type INLINE not supported
classes.inc(1139,3) Error: Procedure type INLINE not supported
classes.inc(1147,3) Error: Procedure type INLINE not supported
classes.i
Hi all,
I don't get as much time as I would like to work on FPC
but I try at least to update from svn every week and to
try to build the compiler.
Using 2.0.4, it has always built ppc1.exe but failed to
build ppc2 and this week's error is rather different.
F:/fpc/fpcbuild/fpcsrc/compiler/ppc1.ex
On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:55:42 +0200 (CEST), Marco van de Voort wrote:
> > I don't know yet whether it will be worth the effort, but it
> > looks as though it could be done if necessary.
>
> It isn't. I never saw the TP compilability of later 1.0.x versions
> confirmed, and even before 1.0 times, s
Hmm, to the list this time.
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:57:18 +0200, Jonas Maebe wrote:
> On 14 Aug 2006, at 18:28, Dave Parsons wrote:
>
> > Well, it should be possible then but are you really saying that the
> > original FPC was all written in assembler?
>
> No, the ori
On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 08:29:17 +0200 (CEST), Tomas Hajny wrote:
> Dave Parsons wrote:
...
> > Well, it should be possible then but are you really saying that the
> > original FPC was all written in assembler?
>
> No, but FPC can generate assembler code from Pascal sources,
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:48:55 +0200 (CEST), Tomas Hajny wrote:
> Dave Parsons wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:15:51 +0200 (CEST), Tomas Hajny wrote:
> >> Dave Parsons wrote:
> >> > On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 23:08:29 +0200, Tomas Hajny wrote:
> .
> .
> > To
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:01:10 +0200, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> On 14 aug 2006, at 17:44, Peter Vreman wrote:
>
> > And you need GNU (cross)binutils for the
> > target platform
>
> Or you can compile to assembler code, copy all assembler files and
> the linker script to the target machine and asse
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:15:51 +0200 (CEST), Tomas Hajny wrote:
Hello Tomas,
> Dave Parsons wrote:
> > On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 23:08:29 +0200, Tomas Hajny wrote:
>
> Hello Dave,
> > I'm new to this list and my interests are in Lazarus under
> > OS/2 and Linu
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 11:39:29 +0200, Vincent Snijders wrote:
>
> Most of the lazarus snapshots are built with fpc 2.0.4-rc3 too.
>
> For download locations of those test builds, see
> http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/Lazarus_Snapshots_Downloads
>
Hi,
Thanks, I downloaded the sourc
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 11:23:28 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time), Michael Van Canneyt
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 14 Aug 2006, Dave Parsons wrote:
>
> > So, thanks for this rc which I have downloaded and built
> > under OS/2. I'm still feeling my way around so I'm not
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 23:08:29 +0200, Tomas Hajny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to announce that the third (and
> hopefully last) release candidate for FPC 2.0.4
> is available for download for most platforms
> (i386-linux, x86_64-linux, i386-win32, powerpc-
> macosx, i386-go32v2, arm-linux and p
25 matches
Mail list logo
