I use viewvc to look at repository - is there an equivalent when everyting
is on gitlaB? tia john
On Thu, 22 Jul 2021 at 13:32, Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal <
fpc-pas...@lists.freepascal.org> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Some of you may have seen this on the lazarus list:
> During the upcoming wee
>
> when using viewcvs
http://svn.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/?sortby=date#dirlist
gives access violation/file not found - worked yesterday! !
win 7 64
ohn
>
>
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
https://lists.freepasca
URL for viewvc broken...
svn.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/?sortby=date#dirlist
>
>
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Hi Kit/Gareth
Thanks for this work - I've been following all your changes to win64. Can't
say I understand all of the vector ones. Be good to commit to trunk asap -
tho' gather your are waiting for some Florian mods.
Just few qs - maybe these could be clarified in comments/example/tests
1) How d
I've lost track of what are the issues in this thread, but if the tar of
the source files is less than 2G and you want to transfer it tar I have a
2G or so ftp site that you could use to transfer the tar. Let me know and
I'll send the details via private email to each of you that needs it.
john
ok, but can we now please return this thread to the original subject re
2.7.1 (and 2.6.4) for rpi. TIA John
On 23 October 2014 13:41, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> On 10/23/2014 11:49 AM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
>> On 23/10/14 11:28, Thaddy de Koning wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> The starting compiler is any o
Thanks. So what exactly does it do? How does one access? Just for wheezy or
will it work on jessie too? John
On 22 October 2014 00:08, peter green wrote:
> peter green wrote:
>
>> So it would seem FPC is currently broken on
>>> stable Raspbian which is a pity.
>>>
>>>
>> It's fine on plain raspb
Don't know why you have this problem with wheezy, but can confirm I'm
running rpi jessie, and the 'sudo' sequence above works for me ok ie does
70Mbyte download & installs fpc with no errors. Haven't really tested it,
but help says it is 2.6.2 -8 rpil+b2 2014/7/21 for arm.
john
On 21 October 201
ok, thanks, let me know where I can get rpi wheezy or jessie binary when
you are ready & I'll publish it as an fpc ftp snapshot. I'll do same for
2.6.x too.
John
On 20 October 2014 10:59, Paul Michell wrote:
> On Friday 17 Oct 2014 23:02:29 John Lee wrote:
> > Looks a
Paul
Looks as if you have a working fpc 2.7.1 snapshot for rpi. IAre you
planning to make this available on your web site? If not, can you zip pls
it, and put it on cloud or some ftp site - I'll then put it on fpc ftp site.
TIA John
On 17 October 2014 21:16, waldo kitty wrote:
> On 10/17/2014
8 January 2014 18:05, Sven Barth wrote:
> Am 08.01.2014 14:21 schrieb "John Lee" :
>
> >
> > In Pascal programmers guide v2.6 Feb 2013 it explains how to use {$I ...
> } to include compiler information eg version string, time string etc so one
> can include
might be the solution for your problem...
>
> Otherwise you can try to submit a patch
> adding such an option.
>
> Pierre
>
>
> > -Message d'origine-
> > De : fpc-devel-boun...@lists.freepascal.org [mailto:fpc-devel-
> > boun...@lists.freepascal
In Pascal programmers guide v2.6 Feb 2013 it explains how to use {$I ... }
to include compiler information eg version string, time string etc so one
can include eg in a writeln, but it does not mention not the optimisation
level at which program was compiled.
Is this an omission or is this info e
This sounds like the best plan if one has several .ppus - as some ppl seem
to have & no source code, that should - but not sure what's involved with
writing the wrapper. Could the whole thing be written in fpc pascal?
Would it be easy to reuse the wrapper for different .ppus? If so this'd be
usef
I'm guessing that you'd need to be pretty au fait with fpc internals & the
code to do this eg because there's no spec, and no tools to help? J
>
>
> In other words: _If_ someone is motivated enough for such a task, it would
> be possible to create a convertor from one PPU version to another (and I
This is a major pain to quite a few users - I have some units for which
source is lost from v2.4. Surely some of the reasons for the changes in ppu
version would _not_ cause a problem with later versions if one isn't using
this particular feature?
Maybe someone could generate a (binary?) patch to
I go back rather (too?) far...eg pre v1.0 - unfortunately I can't remember
what the version was when I first downloaded fpk & tried to compile an fft
- it crashed compiler - fixed by Jonas iirc. I'm so sad that I still use
fpk for fpc directories - I'm kind'a sorry we changed that. I sort of got
Paul,
Why not ask the fpc developers (via fpc-devel) for access to the fpc svn
for your new code. This'll have advantage that it'll be easier for the fpc
gurus to advise on any changes needed for the new target, and of course
it'll make it available to everyone else too. As you probably know fpc h
> > > Maybe we could/should put a fpc compilable version of
> > this into the
> > > > fpc
> > > docs, and into the fpc distribution? Can't imagine that one
> > could do
> > > anything smaller or more portable?
> >
> > P4 is not FPC compilable. It uses ISO style filehandling
> > iirc.
>
> Correct.
>
>
>
> Have a look at the P4 pascal compiler
> http://homepages.cwi.nl/~steven/pascal/ . The whole compiler is written in
> pascal and is only 4000 lines in 1 file. It generates a high level pcode
> and
> comes with a pcode interpreter (1000 lines of pascal in a second file).
> Simpler you can't get
Just googled 'Benjamin Rosseax regexpr' and don't find anything that's
trelevant! Where is it please?
John
On 31 August 2011 15:41, Marcos Douglas wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 2:55 AM, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Florian Klämpfl
> > wrote:
>
21 matches
Mail list logo
