On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 10:05:12PM +0100, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> On 06 Dec 2005, at 22:00, Mark de Wever wrote:
>
> > just started to test a program of mine with the development tree and
> >ran into an internal error 200310221. Compiling with 2.0.0 does work.
> >Only
logs, so no idea how the program looked at that moment.)
Attached the sample program, when putting it in one unit it magically
starts to work.
Regards,
Mark de Wever
program psw_demo;
uses
psw;
begin
end.
unit psw;
interface
{$mode objfpc}
uses
classes;
{$define
w I switched to pasdoc, since it fulfills my shortterm needs. But
I still would be interested to see this option in fpDoc.
Mark de Wever
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 06:13:30PM +0100, Michalis Kamburelis wrote:
> Mark de Wever wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >I like to put a lot of comment in the source and I would like fpdoc to
> >output this comment into the output files. I wrote a small patch to do
> >this wi
27;m not really familiar with both fpdoc and passrc internals I
don't know whether this is the best way to do it, could someone
enlighten me?
Would people like to include this option in fpdoc, behind the option
--include-comment?
Greets,
Mark de Wever
PS comment of the type (* comment *) don&#x
those routines along with the Mac ones I needed.
Attached the changes I made so they can be included in the rtl.
Regards,
Mark de Wever
--- dateutil.inc.orig 2005-11-15 19:38:58.923544296 +0100
+++ dateutil.inc2005-11-15 19:36:49.243258696 +0100
@@ -397,6 +397,15 @@
Function DateT
