terface
{$define InterfaceOnly}
{$I file.pas}
{$undefine InterfaceOnly}
implementation
{$define ImplementationOnly}
{$I file.pas}
{$undefine ImplementationOnly}
Regards,
Martin Sucha
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists
Hi,
2009/5/12 Paul Ishenin :
> Martin Sucha wrote:
>
>> My patch is still hanging around...
>> I'd be very happy if it gets applied ;) Or are there any
>> comments/suggestions?
>
> I can't apply your patch since it touches makefiles and adds depedencies
&g
Hi,
2009/5/5 Martin Sucha:
> 2009/4/29 Martin Sucha:
>> I've translated some C header files to be able to use pangocairo in
>> my application.
> I'm attaching a version of the patch that I consider final.
My patch is still hanging around...
I'd be very happy i
rsions of
cairo in ubuntu hardy (libcairo.so and libcairo.so.2). Maybe we
could update the library name in cairo package (I'm willing to
provide the neccessary (two-line) patch if you think using new
library name is good idea ;) to a name with "2" included.
That's all for now
shared
object I wonder whether I should put these bindings just into pango
unit or create separate unit under packages/gtk2/src/pangocairo?
Would creating pangocairo unit require additional changes to the
build system?
Thanks.
Best Regards
Martin Sucha
_
(I don't know subversion much and
this is my first patch to an open source project).
Thanks
Best Regards
Martin Sucha
Index: packages/gtk2/src/gtk+/gdk/gdkcairo.inc
===
--- packages/gtk2/src/gtk+/gdk/gdkcairo.inc (revision 0
;
I would, however, expect to find it in gdk2 unit.
It seems that declarations from gdkcairo.h[1] were omitted when
creating gtk2 package. Was this intentional?
(To mention the necessary info: I searched in fpc 2.2.4 sources)
Best Regards
Martin Sucha
[1] http://git.gnome.org/cgit/gtk+/plain
