Re: [fpc-devel]PowerPC, TypInfo

2004-08-14 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 20:46:30 +0200 Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I found a bug in the RTTI under powerpc. Boolean properties stored in fields (e.g. properrty MyBoolean: boolean read FMyBoolean) always returns false. The GetOrdProp is used to read boolean values. It reads

Re: [fpc-devel]FPC CVS breaks Lazarus build within IDE

2004-08-13 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 02:09:16 -0500 Tony Maro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just updated my FPC cvs today. My last update was 3 or 4 days ago. I haven't updated Lazarus in a week or so. The latest FPC update breaks building Lazarus from inside the IDE. For those familiar, if you try to

[fpc-devel]Need help for bug report

2004-07-17 Thread Mattias Gaertner
Compiling lazarus with current fpc (since about a week) gives synmacrorecorder.pas(618,43) Error: Asm: [mov ???,mem32] invalid combination of opcode and operands I tried to create a small example for a bug report, but was not able to reproduce it in a small example. procedure

Re: [fpc-devel]Need help for bug report

2004-07-17 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 13:59:33 +0200 Jonas Maebe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 17 jul 2004, at 12:02, Mattias Gaertner wrote: Compiling lazarus with current fpc (since about a week) gives synmacrorecorder.pas(618,43) Error: Asm: [mov ???,mem32] invalid combination of opcode

Re: [fpc-devel]Many new warnings

2004-05-30 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Sun, 30 May 2004 00:04:49 +0200 Peter Vreman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 20:17 29-5-2004, you wrote: On Fri, 28 May 2004 23:24:51 +0200 (CEST) Peter Vreman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The current cvs fpc 1.9.3 gives many new warnings. The following code demonstrates 6 types,

[fpc-devel]Many new warnings

2004-05-28 Thread Mattias Gaertner
The current cvs fpc 1.9.3 gives many new warnings. The following code demonstrates 6 types, where I'm not sure why they now need a warning. Maybe the compiler cracks can tell me, which of them should I report as bugs: program IncredibleWarnings; {$mode objfpc}{$H+} // range checks on {$R+}

Re: [fpc-devel]Status of FPC

2004-03-13 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 17:02:38 +0100 (CET) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PIC/dynamic linking You can write a library in FPC. Please tell me how. As soon as I use strings I get AVs. Mattias ___ fpc-devel maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [fpc-devel]Compile Error

2004-02-03 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Tue, 3 Feb 2004 20:36:38 +1000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (James Mills) wrote: Hi guys, One of you broke the CVS Tree :) lol Compiling intfgraphics.pas intfgraphics.pas(34,29) Fatal: Can't find unit FPIMAGE Since a few hours lazarus uses fpImage as default for images. fpImage is part of

[fpc-devel]RTTI: parameter type TOBJECTPointer

2004-01-06 Thread Mattias Gaertner
Hi, TNotifyEvent is defined as: procedure(Sender:TObject) of object; fpc 1.0.x creates RTTI TypeData: procedure(:TOBJECT) of object while fpc 1.9.x creates RTTI TypeData: procedure(:Pointer) of object Is this a bug or a feature? Mattias ___

[fpc-devel]RPMs and DEBs

2003-09-12 Thread Mattias Gaertner
Hi, How is maintaining the RPMs and DEBs? For example the spec and rules files? Mattias ___ fpc-devel maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

Re: [fpc-devel]Searching fpc 1.0.7, 3 weeks ago

2003-03-16 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Sun, 16 Mar 2003 12:21:17 +0100 Peter Vreman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 11:14 16-3-2003, you wrote: Hi, How can I checkout the FIXES_1_0_0 fpc of 3 weeks ago? The reason is, that this was the last compiler that works for me. Use the -D option to specify a date. The command will the

Re: [fpc-devel]How to get rid of fpc rpm hints

2003-02-21 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 19:03:20 +0100 Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can get rid of the hints if I add -di386 to the command line or to my /etc/fpc.cfg. Is this missing in samplecfg or is there another way to get rid of them? When I build the latest fpc 1.0.7 rpm under redhat 7.3

[fpc-devel]fix for install/debian/rules

2003-02-17 Thread Mattias Gaertner
Hi, I just built the fpc debian packages from the latest fixed branch. It fails, because some examples were not copied. A fix is attached for install/debian/rules. It would be nice if a note can be added to install/debian/README.debian, that building the debs requires debhelper, tetex-bin and

Re: [fpc-devel]making pdf docs

2003-02-13 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 20:22:00 +0100 (W. Europe Standard Time) Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Mattias Gaertner wrote: Hi all, I have trouble making the current docs in pdf (fpc cvs, redhat 7.3). I tried: [fpc]# make -C docs pdf make: Entering

<    2   3   4   5   6   7