At 01:11 PM 4/25/2012, Amir wrote:
I am not sure what you mean be "your program is not valid". I am
initializing Result. Modify its content and ...
I already observed that if I use either shortstring or use indices
to modify Result, this problem does not occur. But still I can't see
what cau
At 08:12 PM 1/22/2012, waldo kitty wrote:
On 1/21/2012 15:49, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Paul Robinson wrote:
I suspect that this will depend on the target operating system, so
the Linux ABI
may differ from e.g. MUSIC/SP.
ABI means what? for those of us reading and trying to keep up ;)
this m
At 06:10 PM 9/16/2011, waldo kitty wrote:
Having UTF-16 RTL might help them in a sense they they will never
have to learn, until they deal with characters
outside of the BMP.
moew old school stuff here... a BMP is a windows style graphic...
what are you guys calling a BMP???
ROTFLMAO!!!
LM
At 08:07 AM 8/31/2011, John Lee wrote:
Just googled 'Benjamin Rosseax regexpr' and don't find anything
that's trelevant! Where is it please?
It might help for a start to get the name right, his last name is "Rosseaux"...
http://bero.freqvibez.net/public/BESEN/BESEN.pas
hth,
Ralf
__
At 02:51 PM 6/10/2011, Martin wrote:
On 10/06/2011 22:31, Jonas Maebe wrote:
This happened during a full make (after a full "make clean")
So both compiler and rtl should have been build, before packages?
fcl-web is then probably just the first package
fcl-web is the only package that curre
At 06:19 PM 3/6/2011, waldo kitty wrote:
On 3/6/2011 16:46, Jeppe Johansen wrote:
A better idea, I think, is to use the old interrupt procedure directive. For
some embedded platforms simply allow also specifying a interrupt vector/index
after the interrupt keyword. Ex:
procedure USARTRxInterrup
At 11:04 AM 9/29/2010, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
Am 29.09.2010 19:57, schrieb Michael Van Canneyt:
>
> Only 5% open bugs ? That's not bad. At work it's much worse.
Problem is imo: the open ones are the time consuming. And imo over time
the absolute number of open bugs should at least stay stable a
At 11:23 AM 8/6/2010, _-jan...@web.de wrote:
Hello all!
It seems like I have hit a very hot spot with my proposal - they
must be something worth...
Let me recapitulate and once more comment on this.
My proposal is to replace the operators "op=" by one operator "op"
and a following ":=".
This
