On 25/06/15 15:21, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
patspiper wrote:
Hi,
Linking a pascal project (with {$L mylib.obj}) with a specific .obj
(COFF32) file using the internal linker (Windows) yields an
executable that produces an exception when run. On the other hand,
the external linker produces a
Hi,
Linking a pascal project (with {$L mylib.obj}) with a specific .obj
(COFF32) file using the internal linker (Windows) yields an executable
that produces an exception when run. On the other hand, the external
linker produces a sane executable.
The executable is supposed to contain calls f
On 31/05/15 21:39, Jonas Maebe wrote:
You can modify the directories where the compiler looks for included
configuration files using the "#CFGDIR xxx" directive inside
configuration files.
This can be a good solution. I have just tested it and it worked.
Is it documented anywhere? The online us
On 31/05/15 19:01, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 31/05/15 17:31, patspiper wrote:
I would like to put my custom cross-compiling switches in an inc file
which is '#INCLUDed' in my fpc.cfg. The inc file will be in the same
folder of fpc.cfg wherever that is. However, #INCLUDE will look in t
Hi,
I would like to put my custom cross-compiling switches in an inc file
which is '#INCLUDed' in my fpc.cfg. The inc file will be in the same
folder of fpc.cfg wherever that is. However, #INCLUDE will look in the
current directory if no path is specified and will fail to locate the
inc file.
On 07/02/15 13:30, Sven Barth wrote:
On 07.02.2015 12:10, Maciej Izak wrote:
Ehm. It's unfair. I arleady posted some time ago that "Invoke" is done
for windows by me... Then you posted that we need version for all
platforms... Double standards in community? :\
It's a bit hard to keep the overv
Hi,
Can any dev have a look at this long standing bug report?
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=22979
Thanks,
Stephano
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
On 12/02/14 12:20, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 12.02.2014 10:01, schrieb patspiper:
On 12/02/14 10:03, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 11.02.2014 23:19, schrieb Mattias Gaertner:
Hi,
How does the compiler (2.6.2, 2.6.4, 2.7.1) search for sub tools like
fpcres?
For example: first in its working directory
On 17/02/14 21:41, Sven Barth wrote:
On 17.02.2014 17:56, patspiper wrote:
On a side note, for 2.7.1, 'fpc -h' shows the -V and -Xp options whereas
'fpc' alone (requires the pressing of to view successive pages)
does not.
Are you sure that fpc is picking up the correct
On 17/02/14 18:26, Tomas Hajny wrote:
On Mon, February 17, 2014 16:13, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014, patspiper wrote:
On 17/02/14 16:45, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:10:03 +0100 (CET)
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014, Mattias Gaertner wrote
On 17/02/14 17:53, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014, patspiper wrote:
On 17/02/14 17:13, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014, patspiper wrote:
On 17/02/14 16:45, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:10:03 +0100 (CET)
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On
On 17/02/14 17:13, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014, patspiper wrote:
On 17/02/14 16:45, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:10:03 +0100 (CET)
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
[...]
Is there already a doc about how to
On 17/02/14 16:45, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:10:03 +0100 (CET)
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
[...]
Is there already a doc about how to install multiple versions of fpc?
No, because
a) There are so many ways to do it
b) There are
On 16/02/14 16:28, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Mattias Gaertner said:
The second is actually
/../etc/fpc.cfg
So, fpc first searches a user config, then a "flavor" config (e.g. one
per version) and the last is the global config.
When installing multiple version of fpc you
On 12/02/14 10:03, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 11.02.2014 23:19, schrieb Mattias Gaertner:
Hi,
How does the compiler (2.6.2, 2.6.4, 2.7.1) search for sub tools like
fpcres?
For example: first in its working directory, then in PATH, etc.
Usual order is this:
- path specified by -FD
- path of compiler
On 28/12/12 17:46, patspiper wrote:
On 28/12/12 17:41, patspiper wrote:
On 28/12/12 17:00, Ewald wrote:
Once upon a time, on 12/28/2012 11:01 AM to be precise, patspiper said:
On 27/12/12 22:38, Ewald wrote:
Hmmm, that;s indeed quite some different output you've got there.
Mine looks
On 28/12/12 17:41, patspiper wrote:
On 28/12/12 17:00, Ewald wrote:
Once upon a time, on 12/28/2012 11:01 AM to be precise, patspiper said:
On 27/12/12 22:38, Ewald wrote:
Hmmm, that;s indeed quite some different output you've got there.
Mine looks like this:
processor
On 28/12/12 17:00, Ewald wrote:
Once upon a time, on 12/28/2012 11:01 AM to be precise, patspiper said:
On 27/12/12 22:38, Ewald wrote:
Hmmm, that;s indeed quite some different output you've got there.
Mine looks like this:
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
On 27/12/12 22:38, Ewald wrote:
Hmmm, that;s indeed quite some different output you've got there. Mine
looks like this:
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 23
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8600 @ 3.33G
On 25/10/12 09:50, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 25.10.2012 01:55 schrieb "luiz americo pereira camara"
mailto:luiz...@oi.com.br>>:
> Regarding Delphi compatibility, currently fpc already lacks much
features in areas like attributes, anounimous methods, generics,
interfaces, unicode and some will neve
On 04/04/12 12:23, Jonas Maebe wrote:
Paul Ishenin wrote on Wed, 04 Apr 2012:
04.04.2012 17:08, kyan ???:
Delphi doesn't support qword at all, so there is no Delphi
behaviour to
be compatible with in that case. Or at least it didn't when the above
was implemented. Does it now?
No, it d
On 04/04/12 01:57, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 03 Apr 2012, at 20:27, patspiper wrote:
The following is related to bug #0021641 (Array of const gives check range
error).
Is it correct for the exception to manifest itself in the dword case and not
the qword one?
writeln(Format('%d
The following is related to bug #0021641 (Array of const gives check
range error).
Is it correct for the exception to manifest itself in the dword case and
not the qword one?
writeln(Format('%d', [qword(qword(High(Int64))+1)])); //ok
writeln(Format('%d', [dword(dword(High(integer))+1)]))
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
24 matches
Mail list logo
