On 29 June 2016 at 19:51, wrote:
> On 06/29/2016 12:09 PM, Henry Vermaak wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:56:30AM +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>>
>>> FPC 3.0 indeed contains a bug. This has meanwhile been fixed.
>>>
>>> If I compile the program with trunk, I get:
>>>
>>> home: >fpc tt.
I have been looking forward the release of FreePascal 3.0.2 but there
doesn't seem to be any conversations about it
My main concern though is some critical bugs in currency arithmetic, Bug
29760, that are supposed to go nto 3.0.2. I don't mind using fixes if it
has been committed to fixes, which
On 28 February 2016 at 09:48, Marcos Douglas wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Sven Barth
> wrote:
> > Mostly don't like, but also it introduces a ambiguity in the language
> > especially since you could use your proposed variant in a single line as
> > well.
> > I'd more prefer the $Inc
These messages come up almost always when I compile a project:
Warning: "crti.o" not found, this will probably cause a linking failure
templateSys.lpr(39,1) Warning: "crtn.o" not found, this will probably cause
a linking failure.
On a 32bit system the files are located in /usr/lib/i386-gnu and
/u
On 12 May 2015 at 21:32, Alfred wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I got a message from "JuhaManninen" on the Lazarus forum:
>
>
> http://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,27211.0.html?PHPSESSID=bf43911005bf788ab072b3d73d1bfb4f
>
>
> http://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,27211.msg177117
On 12 July 2013 09:01, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 12 Jul 2013, vfclists . wrote:
>
>
>>
>>
>> On 12 July 2013 08:18, Michael Van Canneyt
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 11 Jul 2013, vfclists . wrote:
>>
>
On 12 July 2013 08:18, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 11 Jul 2013, vfclists . wrote:
>
> Should TObject or TComponent have a Comment property?
>>
>> I think they should. One for the design itself and one for describing the
>> usage at design or runtim
On 11 July 2013 23:07, Benito van der Zander wrote:
> Annotations like in Java would be nice...
>
>
> On 07/11/2013 10:22 PM, vfclists . wrote:
>
> Should TObject or TComponent have a Comment property?
>
> I think they should. One for the design itself and one for d
Should TObject or TComponent have a Comment property?
I think they should. One for the design itself and one for describing the
usage at design or runtime.
Smalltalk has it.
Consider it a version of the Hint property but for the developer
--
Frank Church
===
http://devblog
