Re: [fpc-devel] *** GMX Spamverdacht *** An extension of fpc language: the BASED construct

2017-12-26 Thread Giuliano Colla
Il 26/12/2017 18:43, Karoly Balogh (Charlie/SGR) ha scritto: As far as I understand (I did not try) this was once supported, but explicitly removed by FPC 2.4.0 from Absolute keyword dereferencing is no longer allowed:

Re: [fpc-devel] *** GMX Spamverdacht *** An extension of fpc language: the BASED construct

2017-12-26 Thread Giuliano Colla
Il 26/12/2017 18:43, Karoly Balogh (Charlie/SGR) ha scritto: HI, On Tue, 26 Dec 2017, Thorsten Engler wrote: Item: BYTE BASED ItemPtr; Ignoring any other considerations for now, I would have at least used a logical extension derived from already supported syntax: Item: Byte absolute

Re: [fpc-devel] *** GMX Spamverdacht *** An extension of fpc language: the BASED construct

2017-12-26 Thread Karoly Balogh (Charlie/SGR)
HI, On Tue, 26 Dec 2017, Thorsten Engler wrote: > > Item: BYTE BASED ItemPtr; > > Ignoring any other considerations for now, I would have at least used a > logical extension derived from already supported syntax: > > Item: Byte absolute ItemPtr^; As far as I understand (I did not try) this was

Re: [fpc-devel] *** GMX Spamverdacht *** An extension of fpc language: the BASED construct

2017-12-26 Thread Sven Barth via fpc-devel
Am 26.12.2017 14:44 schrieb "Thorsten Engler" : > Item: BYTE BASED ItemPtr; Ignoring any other considerations for now, I would have at least used a logical extension derived from already supported syntax: Item: Byte absolute ItemPtr^; I agree, as it avoids adding a

Re: [fpc-devel] *** GMX Spamverdacht *** An extension of fpc language: the BASED construct

2017-12-26 Thread Thorsten Engler
> Item: BYTE BASED ItemPtr; Ignoring any other considerations for now, I would have at least used a logical extension derived from already supported syntax: Item: Byte absolute ItemPtr^; ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org