Ryan Joseph via fpc-devel schrieb am Fr.,
23. Apr. 2021, 00:53:
>
>
> > On Apr 21, 2021, at 11:21 PM, Sven Barth
> wrote:
> >
> > You need to use named types, though for operators this is less useful,
> because the compiler will implicitly convert different ShortString types to
> find a
> On Apr 21, 2021, at 11:21 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
>
> You need to use named types, though for operators this is less useful,
> because the compiler will implicitly convert different ShortString types to
> find a suitable operator overload:
Then the compiler must do this for all strings
Am 21.04.2021 um 20:05 schrieb Ryan Joseph via fpc-devel:
On Apr 20, 2021, at 11:38 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
All four string types provide built in > and < operators:
On a side note how do you even make overloads (or type helpers for that matter)
for short strings because String[10] isn't the
> On Apr 20, 2021, at 11:38 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
>
> All four string types provide built in > and < operators:
On a side note how do you even make overloads (or type helpers for that matter)
for short strings because String[10] isn't the same type as String[100]?
Regards,
Ryan
