This mail is to discuss issue http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13630.
From the issue description:
Given the definitions:
type
T1 = class
procedure SetP(AP: Integer); virtual;
property P: Integer read FP write SetP;
end;
T2 = class(T1)
procedure SetP(AP: Integer);
On Sat, 2 May 2009 01:45:14 +1100
Alexander Klenin kle...@gmail.com wrote:
This mail is to discuss issue
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13630.
From the issue description:
Given the definitions:
type
T1 = class
procedure SetP(AP: Integer); virtual;
property P:
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 01:56, Mattias Gaertner
nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote:
4) If it has setter named SetP, do the equivalent of inherited
SetP.
Why?
Because this surprises developers and leads to bugs.
See the issue http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13418
(linked from the discussed
On Sat, 2 May 2009 02:17:48 +1100
Alexander Klenin kle...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 01:56, Mattias Gaertner
nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote:
4) If it has setter named SetP, do the equivalent of inherited
SetP.
Why?
Because this surprises developers and leads to bugs.
On Sat, 2 May 2009 02:57:49 +1100
Alexander Klenin kle...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 02:39, Mattias Gaertner
nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote:
On Sat, 2 May 2009 02:17:48 +1100
Alexander Klenin kle...@gmail.com wrote:
Because this surprises developers and leads to bugs.
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 03:16, Mattias Gaertner
nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote:
Is there a Mercurial mirror of FPC docs?
Don't know.
Will you create the bug report?
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13632
Is the mirror would be available, I'd create a patch too.
Alternative solution
