Vincent Snijders wrote:
2011/9/9 Mark Morgan Lloyd :
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 09/09/2011 14:34, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Is there a "correct" way of telling the build process to skip the fp IDE?
Delete the 'ide' folder? :)
But won't the top-level makefile rules object to that?
I would
2011/9/9 Mark Morgan Lloyd :
> Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
>>
>> On 09/09/2011 14:34, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
>>>
>>> Is there a "correct" way of telling the build process to skip the fp IDE?
>>
>> Delete the 'ide' folder? :)
>
> But won't the top-level makefile rules object to that?
I would just t
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 09/09/2011 14:34, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Is there a "correct" way of telling the build process to skip the fp
IDE?
Delete the 'ide' folder? :)
But won't the top-level makefile rules object to that?
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
[Opin
On 09/09/11 13:34, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Is there a "correct" way of telling the build process to skip the fp
IDE? I'm trying to build trunk for SPARC so I can test the two recent
FPC fixes plus another in Lazarus and am getting an error when building
fp which I'd rather not stop to look at ri
On 09/09/2011 14:34, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> Is there a "correct" way of telling the build process to skip the fp
> IDE?
Delete the 'ide' folder? :)
A 'svn revert' can always restore it later.
Regards,
- Graeme -
--
fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal
http://
Is there a "correct" way of telling the build process to skip the fp
IDE? I'm trying to build trunk for SPARC so I can test the two recent
FPC fixes plus another in Lazarus and am getting an error when building
fp which I'd rather not stop to look at right now (although I'll try to
report it la
