On 01/28/2013 12:51 PM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
People stubbornly trying to use it anyway is exactly the reason why it
isn't compiled by default anymore.
Obviously and as it should be !
It was just a documentation problem and silly me not taking "old" for
"depreciated".
Thanks again,
-Mic
In our previous episode, Michael Schnell said:
>
> Here: http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/rtl/oldlinux/signal.html I
> see: "Install signal handler (deprecated) ... This call has the same
> functionality as the *SigAction* call. "
>
> So I tried to do this:
> http://www.freepascal.org/docs-
On 01/28/2013 12:24 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
What does the name "old" imply to you?
I did not want to ask before having tried on my own ;-) .
-Michael
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo
Am 28.01.2013 12:20, schrieb Michael Schnell:
Hi Linux fans,
I'd like to catch a signal sent to a Linux program.
Here: http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/rtl/oldlinux/signal.html I
see: "Install signal handler (deprecated) ... This call has the same
functionality as the *SigAction* call. "
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:20:30PM +0100, Michael Schnell wrote:
> So: Hot to catch a signal ?
Use FpSig* in unit BaseUnix.
Henry
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Hi Linux fans,
I'd like to catch a signal sent to a Linux program.
Here: http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/rtl/oldlinux/signal.html I
see: "Install signal handler (deprecated) ... This call has the same
functionality as the *SigAction* call. "
So I tried to do this:
http://www.freepascal.
