ed - without being a compiler writer if
their MCU isn't supported.
And, as I said - I don't see how giving someone the choice of implementations
is
a bad thing.
John
From: Florian Klämpfl
To: FPC developers' list
Sent: Sat, August 27, 201
Am 26.08.2011 16:53, schrieb David Welch:
> need to apply this patch, like the wiki thing maybe there is a place I
> have to sign up to be able to check in to svn, otherwise. The lpc and
> sam7 parts are ARM7TDMI which is an armv4t not remotely able to
> support the armv7 instructions. the correc
Am 27.08.2011 20:33, schrieb John Clymer:
> I assume I speak for others, but for those of us that have been working
> in the embedded field for a while, some of us prefer to roll our own
> support code, rather than rely on compiler supplied implementations.
> Personnally, I've used 6 different ARM
FPC developers' list
Sent: Sat, August 27, 2011 7:08:21 PM
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] DIFF patch for changing to table driven processor
definitions for ARM
Am 27.08.2011 17:01, schrieb David Welch:
> In short I am saying it saves time for the individuals trying to add
> targets.
No, it
Am 27.08.2011 17:01, schrieb David Welch:
> In short I am saying it saves time for the individuals trying to add
> targets.
No, it saves no time in total and is against any OSS spirit: imagine ten
people developing for say the lpc2148 (or any other not yet supported
controller). All of them use th
One case would be as a framework to build other targets instead of
having to delete a bunch of stuff then add a bunch of stuff you just add
stuff.
I have an interest in a generic target where the target specific stuff
is not embedded in the compiler but is in the code. At the moment the
me
Am 27.08.2011 14:19, schrieb John Clymer:
> Crap ! Forgot to SVN ADD ...
>
> File attached.
>
Is there any use in having such generic controllers? What's the use case
of them?
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.fr
Crap ! Forgot to SVN ADD ...
File attached.
From: David Welch
To: FPC developers' list
Sent: Sat, August 27, 2011 7:06:36 AM
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] DIFF patch for changing to table driven processor
definitions for ARM
when building for SUBARCH=cor
bedded/Makefile (revision 18854)
+++ rtl/embedded/Makefile (working copy)
@@ -317,7 +317,7 @@
ifeq ($(SUBARCH),cortexm3)
CPU_UNITS=lm3fury lm3tempest thumb2_bare stm32f103
endif
-ifeq ($(SUBARCH),armv7)
+ifeq ($(SUBARCH),armv4)
CPU_UNITS=lpc21x4 at91sam7x256
endif
endif
On Fri,
mpest thumb2_bare stm32f103
> endif
> -ifeq ($(SUBARCH),armv7)
> +ifeq ($(SUBARCH),armv4)
> CPU_UNITS=lpc21x4 at91sam7x256
> endif
> endif
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 5:17 AM, John Clymer wrote:
>> Part of what I submitted was 2 batch files in the root dire
>
> John
>
>
>
> From: David Welch
> To: FPC developers' list
> Sent: Fri, August 26, 2011 6:17:43 AM
> Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] DIFF patch for changing to table driven processor
> definitions for ARM
>
>
> Can someone with the power to updat
st 26, 2011 6:17:43 AM
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] DIFF patch for changing to table driven processor
definitions for ARM
Can someone with the power to update the wiki (maybe we all do I dont know)
change the target embedded page to reflect the SUBARCH thing?
Also either put a link to
2011/8/26 Florian Klämpfl :
> Am 26.08.2011 04:13, schrieb David Welch:
>> cpuinfo.pas(156,2) Fatal: Can't open include file "controllerunit.inc"
>
> Fixed, I forgot to commit a file, sorry.
>
> ___
> fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
Am 26.08.2011 04:13, schrieb David Welch:
> cpuinfo.pas(156,2) Fatal: Can't open include file "controllerunit.inc"
Fixed, I forgot to commit a file, sorry.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/lis
You can modify the wiki yourself, you just need to register.
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Can someone with the power to update the wiki (maybe we all do I dont
know) change the target embedded page to reflect the SUBARCH thing?
Also either put a link to
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Binutils
or spell out something like this:
./configure --target=arm-linux --prefix=/somethin
cpuinfo.pas(156,2) Fatal: Can't open include file "controllerunit.inc"
On 08/25/2011 05:50 PM, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
OS_TARGET=embedded CPU_TARGET=arm SUBARCH=cortexm3
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal
Am 23.08.2011 17:56, schrieb John Clymer:
> If there are no major objections or blatant errors I've missed, could
> someone post this to the repository - or give me some directions to do so.
Thanks for your work! I have committed your changes slightly modified to
svn in rev. 18848. What I changed
On 08/24/2011 12:04 PM, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
If you are really concerned, you should finally start to create a patch.
As I already said very often, I am concerned and trying to help, but
right not in need of anything nor requesting anything to be done. This
state might or might not change one
Am 24.08.2011 11:41, schrieb Michael Schnell:
> On 08/23/2011 05:56 PM, John Clymer wrote:
>> ...
>
> Does this only handle thumb issues or other differences of the
> instruction sets of different ARM versions as well ?
What does the topic say?
>
> Especially I am concerned about the "atomic" o
On 08/23/2011 05:56 PM, John Clymer wrote:
...
Does this only handle thumb issues or other differences of the
instruction sets of different ARM versions as well ?
Especially I am concerned about the "atomic" options (that some ARMs
provide e.g. LDREX / STREX instructions for).
-Michael
_
21 matches
Mail list logo
