Regarding the FPC 3.0 what's new language features, I think there is are
more new than what's listed on the wiki. Off the top of my head here two
language features not present in 2.6.4:
* Helpers now work on intrinsic types such as string and integer (eg.
StringHelper = record helper for string)
*
On Sat, 5 Sep 2015, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van:Luiz Americo Pereira Camara
Verzonden: zo 30-08-2015 19:56
Onderwerp: Re: [fpc-devel] FPC 3.0.0-rc1 release
Aan: FPC developers' list ;
Em 30/08/2015 12:43, "Marco van de Voort&qu
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van:Luiz Americo Pereira Camara
Verzonden: zo 30-08-2015 19:56
Onderwerp: Re: [fpc-devel] FPC 3.0.0-rc1 release
Aan:FPC developers' list ;
> Em 30/08/2015 12:43, "Marco van de Voort" <mailto:mar...@stack.nl> > escrev
On Sun, 30 Aug 2015, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
Em 30/08/2015 12:43, "Marco van de Voort" escreveu:
In our previous episode, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara said:
packages/fcl-web/src/base/[restcodegen.pp, restbase.pp] were merged to
3.0
branch by marco after the last googleapi chang
In our previous episode, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara said:
> packages/fcl-web/src/base/[restcodegen.pp, restbase.pp] were merged to 3.0
> branch by marco after the last googleapi change.
>
> Units in the bottom of stack like custcgi.pp and httpdefs.pp were also
> merged
True, but that is well bef
On 30/08/15 11:18, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 30 Aug 2015, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
>> On 30/08/15 09:35, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>>>
>> Adding a new package is really not done between a release candidate and
>> the final release. And merging it can always introduce a new build or
>
On Sun, 30 Aug 2015, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 30/08/15 09:35, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Sat, 29 Aug 2015, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
Any specific reason why packages/googleapi is absent from 3.0?
None specific. It was simply committed to SVN after the branch was made.
In theory,
On 30/08/15 09:35, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> On Sat, 29 Aug 2015, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
>
>> Any specific reason why packages/googleapi is absent from 3.0?
>
> None specific. It was simply committed to SVN after the branch was made.
> In theory, there should be no danger to inc
On Sat, 29 Aug 2015, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
2015-08-25 12:50 GMT-03:00 Joost van der Sluis :
Hello
We have placed the first release candidate of the Free Pascal Compiler
version 3.0.0 on our ftp servers.
You can help improve the upcoming 3.0.0 release by downloading and
test
On 8/29/2015 11:31 AM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
> On 29/08/15 11:16, John Marino wrote:
>
>> Hi, I'm retesting an diffset to put FPC 3.0 in FreeBSD ports. I notice
>> the file is named 3.0.0-rc1 with a similar tag in github's svn mirror,
>> but when I build it, the version is listed as 3.0.1
>
> The v
On 29/08/15 11:16, John Marino wrote:
> Hi, I'm retesting an diffset to put FPC 3.0 in FreeBSD ports. I notice
> the file is named 3.0.0-rc1 with a similar tag in github's svn mirror,
> but when I build it, the version is listed as 3.0.1
The version number in the tagged svn version is definitely
On 8/25/2015 5:50 PM, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> Hello
>
> We have placed the first release candidate of the Free Pascal Compiler
> version 3.0.0 on our ftp servers.
>
> You can help improve the upcoming 3.0.0 release by downloading and
> testing this release. If you want you can report what yo
Am 28.08.2015 10:56 schrieb "Maciej Izak" :
>
> 2015-08-25 17:50 GMT+02:00 Joost van der Sluis :
>>
>> You can help improve the upcoming 3.0.0 release by downloading and
>> testing this release. If you want you can report what you have done here:
>> http://wiki.freepascal.org/Testers_3.0.0
>
>
> I
2015-08-25 17:50 GMT+02:00 Joost van der Sluis :
> You can help improve the upcoming 3.0.0 release by downloading and
> testing this release. If you want you can report what you have done here:
> http://wiki.freepascal.org/Testers_3.0.0
>
I have created short report in mentioned wiki page. Is ver
On Fri, 28 Aug 2015, Maciej Izak wrote:
2015-08-25 17:50 GMT+02:00 Joost van der Sluis :
A preview of the 3.0.0 docs is available at
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/3.0.0/
Small bug in documentation for
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/3.0.0/rtl/system/finalizearray.html
in desc
2015-08-25 17:50 GMT+02:00 Joost van der Sluis :
>
> A preview of the 3.0.0 docs is available at
> http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/3.0.0/
Small bug in documentation for
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/3.0.0/rtl/system/finalizearray.html
in description is described InitializeArray inste
Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Mark Morgan Lloyd said:
I still have a few NT4 app servers, and a very small number of W2K systems.
Possession That's not the important question, rather how much new software
do you develop for those?
I'd not expect to ship anything external
In our previous episode, Mark Morgan Lloyd said:
> I still have a few NT4 app servers, and a very small number of W2K systems.
Possession That's not the important question, rather how much new software
do you develop for those?
___
fpc-devel maillist -
Tomas Hajny wrote:
On Thu, August 27, 2015 15:03, Frank Grotelueschen wrote:
Please don't stop support for W2K. It was the first 'full useable' Windows
based on NT-Kernel and is still used today.
I don't think that the Win32 target maintainers would want to break
working under W2K on purpose
On Thu, August 27, 2015 15:03, Frank Grotelueschen wrote:
> At 10:42 26.08.2015, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
>>Am 26.08.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Marco van de Voort:
> ..
>> > Yup, and remove w2k and NT(4) too. While they might work, they
>> are no longer
>> > formally supported and tested afaik.
>>
>>Ques
At 10:42 26.08.2015, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Am 26.08.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Marco van de Voort:
..
> Yup, and remove w2k and NT(4) too. While they might work, they
are no longer
> formally supported and tested afaik.
Question is: if the first is the target system and the latter the host
syste
In our previous episode, Florian Klaempfl said:
> >>> Win32:
> >>> - MS Windows NT/2000/2003/XP/Vista/7 (Win95, 98 and ME are not supported
> >>>in FPC officially any longer).
> >> But here is Win95,98,Me explicitly excluded.
> >> I think, that at first place it should be also excluded.
> >
>
Am 26.08.2015 08:36 schrieb "Kazantsev Alexey" :
>
> On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 19:50:50 +0400, Joost van der Sluis
> wrote:
>
>> We have placed the first release candidate of the Free Pascal Compiler
>> version 3.0.0 on our ftp servers.
>
>
> This bugs is unworthy to be released in 3.0 :)
>
>
> http://b
Am 26.08.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Marco van de Voort:
> In our previous episode, LacaK said:
>>> i386, x86_64, PowerPC or Sparc processor
>>> Win32:
>>> - MS Windows NT/2000/2003/XP/Vista/7 (Win95, 98 and ME are not supported
>>>in FPC officially any longer).
>> But here is Win95,98,Me explicitly
In our previous episode, LacaK said:
> > i386, x86_64, PowerPC or Sparc processor
> > Win32:
> > - MS Windows NT/2000/2003/XP/Vista/7 (Win95, 98 and ME are not supported
> >in FPC officially any longer).
> But here is Win95,98,Me explicitly excluded.
> I think, that at first place it should be
On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 19:50:50 +0400, Joost van der Sluis
wrote:
We have placed the first release candidate of the Free Pascal Compiler
version 3.0.0 on our ftp servers.
This bugs is unworthy to be released in 3.0 :)
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=27349
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.
News and changes related to this release are described in whatsnew.txt.
Free Pascal 3.0.0 is currently available for the following platforms:
- Linux-i386
- Linux-x86_64 (amd64)
- Linux-powerpc
- Linux-sparc
- Linux-ARM
- Win32-i386 (Win95/98/Me/XP/2000/2003/Vista/7 and WinNT)
Here is mention
Am 25.08.2015 18:02 schrieb "silvioprog" :
> Wow!
>
> This is the best news in this year!
>
> \o/\o/\o/ Congratulations! \o/\o/\o/
It's /only/ the release candidate, you know?
Also: did you really have to quote the whole mail? (I mean one can
definitely argue about the acceptable length of quotes,
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> Hello
>
> We have placed the first release candidate of the Free Pascal Compiler
> version 3.0.0 on our ftp servers.
>
> You can help improve the upcoming 3.0.0 release by downloading and
> testing this release. If you want you can re
Hello
We have placed the first release candidate of the Free Pascal Compiler
version 3.0.0 on our ftp servers.
You can help improve the upcoming 3.0.0 release by downloading and
testing this release. If you want you can report what you have done here:
http://wiki.freepascal.org/Testers_3.0.0
Ne
30 matches
Mail list logo
