On 02/15/2013 11:45 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
Nevertheless I'm currently mostly working on Coldfire support.
While this obviously is viable, I (understanding that the Coldfire ISA
is a subset of CPU32), do hope that the final version is able to
optionally work for both flavors (plus the "big" 68 K
On 02/14/2013 03:57 AM, Mike Salish wrote:
At the moment the 68K versions still in production are all for control
applications in embedded systems. These chips use the CPU32 and more
recently the MCF5 Coldfire architecture. For MCF there are some
sources of small and cheap demo boards (netg
I will give that a try in the next week or two. Production deadlines
prevent me from jumping on it right now.
As far as fitting the compiled output to a generic RTOS embedded system
it would seem to me that:
Each Pascal main program is treated as a task/process that runs unto
itself other th
Am 15.02.2013 08:39 schrieb "Mike Salish" :
>
> It was interesting to see renewed activity in the compiler for the 68K
architecture. I've been using another old compiler, written in Pascal, for
embedded development for many years and been wanting to give FPC a try. My
existing compiler emits assemb
On 02/14/2013 03:57 AM, Mike Salish wrote:
All that is missing is the 68K code generator and RTL and... a few
more bits.
AFAIK, The 68 K compiler is currently being worked on and already is
able to do something useful.
I have not heard about that project since some weeks, so I don't know
t
It was interesting to see renewed activity in the compiler for the 68K
architecture. I've been using another old compiler, written in Pascal,
for embedded development for many years and been wanting to give FPC a
try. My existing compiler emits assembler for the 68K and CPU32 but
lacks the feat