On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> >
> > If you leave the decorators intact, I don't see why not. I don't think
> > using one excludes the other ?
> >
>
> No, the plan was to leave the decorators as is. Simply add more functionality
> to the fpcunit.p
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
If you leave the decorators intact, I don't see why not. I don't think
using one excludes the other ?
No, the plan was to leave the decorators as is. Simply add more
functionality to the fpcunit.pp file.
Regards,
- Graeme -
__
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We use FPCUnit and DUnit2 (branch of DUnit v1) extensively in the tiOPF
> [http://www.tiopf.com] project. DUnit2 has some impressive enhancements added
> and improved design.
>
> One of the improvements is built-in support of SetupOnce/Te
Hi,
We use FPCUnit and DUnit2 (branch of DUnit v1) extensively in the tiOPF
[http://www.tiopf.com] project. DUnit2 has some impressive enhancements
added and improved design.
One of the improvements is built-in support of SetupOnce/TeardownOnce
without the need for Decorators. Currently we
