On Tue, April 15, 2008 16:02, Lee, John wrote:
> There are checks in script (eg that there are no make errors or zip
> errors) to ensure that only 'good' snapshots are uploaded, but guess
> they don't work 100% eg if there is a network funny, or PC crash or
> something else odd during the upload -
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008, Giulio Bernardi wrote:
> Tomas Hajny ha scritto:
> > Sorry, not root of ZIP file but root of units/i386-win32. Anyway, this
> > seems to be specific to 2.3.x (at least as of now, i.e. unless this bit
> > gets merged), because these units apparently belong to the new fpcres.
Tomas Hajny ha scritto:
Sorry, not root of ZIP file but root of units/i386-win32. Anyway, this
seems to be specific to 2.3.x (at least as of now, i.e. unless this bit
gets merged), because these units apparently belong to the new fpcres. I
guess that they shouldn't be distributed at all as they a
There are checks in script (eg that there are no make errors or zip
errors) to ensure that only 'good' snapshots are uploaded, but guess
they don't work 100% eg if there is a network funny, or PC crash or
something else odd during the upload - I use pscp & check its error
code.
Let me know if thi
On Mon, April 14, 2008 23:10, Tomas Hajny wrote:
> On Mon, April 14, 2008 16:04, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>> On 12 Apr 2008, at 20:06, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>>
>>> don't know what's up with the Windows snapshots. The 2.3.1 one
>>> hasn't been updated at all in ages,
>>
>> Actually, it seems this has been fi
On Mon, April 14, 2008 23:10, Tomas Hajny wrote:
> On Mon, April 14, 2008 16:04, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>> On 12 Apr 2008, at 20:06, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>>
>>> don't know what's up with the Windows snapshots. The 2.3.1 one
>>> hasn't been updated at all in ages,
>>
>> Actually, it seems this has been fi
On Mon, April 14, 2008 16:04, Jonas Maebe wrote:
> On 12 Apr 2008, at 20:06, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
>> don't know what's up with the Windows snapshots. The 2.3.1 one
>> hasn't been updated at all in ages,
>
> Actually, it seems this has been fixed in the mean time and they are
> being updated again.
On 12 Apr 2008, at 20:06, Jonas Maebe wrote:
don't know what's up with the Windows snapshots. The 2.3.1 one
hasn't been updated at all in ages,
Actually, it seems this has been fixed in the mean time and they are
being updated again.
Jonas
___
On 14 Apr 2008, at 13:46, Lee, John wrote:
I've mentioned the problem recently to Tomas, who 'owns' (or at
least has fixed in past) the scripts that generate the fpc.zips (a
few weeks ago). The v22 fpc.zip (in snapshots/ source/v22) that I
use for the v22 go32v2 and win32 snapshots (and f
updated by
my daily snapshot script, it builds fine here!
Regards John
> Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] Fixes of FPC version 2.2.0
>
>
>
> On 12 Apr 2008, at 19:52, Yiannis Dondos wrote:
>
> > I just wanted to ask if the current version 2.2.1 already includes
> >
On 12 Apr 2008, at 19:52, Yiannis Dondos wrote:
I just wanted to ask if the current version 2.2.1 already includes
all the fixes done since the release of 2.2.0.
No, it doesn't.
The reason I am asking this is because I downloaded a very recent
version of 'base_w32_v22.zip' from the FreePa
Hello everybody,
I just wanted to ask if the current version 2.2.1 already includes all
the fixes done since the release of 2.2.0. The reason I am asking this
is because I downloaded a very recent version of 'base_w32_v22.zip' from
the FreePascal FTP server
(ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/s
12 matches
Mail list logo
