Am 27.05.2016 07:25 schrieb "LacaK" :
>
> Thank you!
> Is it for FPC 3.2 only or can it be backported to 3.0 series (3.0.4
probably?) ?
It's for 3.2 only.
Regards,
Sven
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.or
Thank you!
Is it for FPC 3.2 only or can it be backported to 3.0 series (3.0.4
probably?) ?
L.
Hello together!
For those that are interested: I've improved the inlining for
specializations of generics so that now the bodies of specialized
routines (no matter whether they are normal methods
Am 26.05.2016 21:38 schrieb "Maciej Izak" :
>
> 2016-05-26 21:06 GMT+02:00 Sven Barth :
>>
>> ... as long as the body of the generic routine is already available
(basically the same rules as for inlining normal routines) (see
tests/test/ugeneric102.pp for an example)
>
>
> Nice one Sven! :) Is ther
2016-05-26 21:06 GMT+02:00 Sven Barth :
> ... as long as the body of the generic routine is already available
> (basically the same rules as for inlining normal routines) (see
> tests/test/ugeneric102.pp for an example)
>
Nice one Sven! :) Is there some warning when method is not inlined in the
c
Hello together!
For those that are interested: I've improved the inlining for
specializations of generics so that now the bodies of specialized routines
(no matter whether they are normal methods of generic classes, records,
etc. or true generic routines) are inlined as long as the body of the
gen
