Re: [fpc-devel] Managed types and reference counts revisited

2016-08-17 Thread Adriaan van Os
Jonas Maebe wrote: Adriaan van Os wrote on Wed, 17 Aug 2016: Either I am looking wrong (and missing the point) or the text at (a follow-up on ) is incorrect. Doesn't the call to DoIt1(y,7)

Re: [fpc-devel] Managed types and reference counts revisited

2016-08-17 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 17 Aug 2016, Adriaan van Os wrote: Thanks for the clarification. I suggest the doc page to be changed accordingly. And also the test program there. And what do you want to see changed ? The test program shows the actual

Re: [fpc-devel] Managed types and reference counts revisited

2016-08-17 Thread Adriaan van Os
Thanks for the clarification. I suggest the doc page to be changed accordingly. And also the test program there. Regards, Adriaan van Os ___ fpc-devel maillist -

Re: [fpc-devel] Managed types and reference counts revisited

2016-08-17 Thread Jonas Maebe
Adriaan van Os wrote on Wed, 17 Aug 2016: Either I am looking wrong (and missing the point) or the text at (a follow-up on ) is incorrect. Doesn't the call to DoIt1(y,7) in procedure Test3

[fpc-devel] Managed types and reference counts revisited

2016-08-17 Thread Adriaan van Os
Either I am looking wrong (and missing the point) or the text at (a follow-up on ) is incorrect. Doesn't the call to DoIt1(y,7) in procedure Test3 cause the reference count to be increased