In our previous episode, Sven Barth said:
> > Do you think, that something similar can be added also in FPC ?
>
> There is already a WriteAnsiString (
> http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/rtl/classes/tstream.writeansistring.html
> ) with the difference that it also writes out the length. Adding a
How about introducing a default parameter?
The parameter keeps the method backward compatible, allowing write a string
without the prefix.
public procedure TStream.WriteAnsiString(
const S: string;
withLength: Boolean = true;
);
thanks,
Dmitry
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 5:34 AM, Marco van de V
Am 21.07.2014 11:34 schrieb "Marco van de Voort" :
>
> In our previous episode, Sven Barth said:
> > > Do you think, that something similar can be added also in FPC ?
> >
> > There is already a WriteAnsiString (
> >
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/rtl/classes/tstream.writeansistring.html
> > )
Dmitry Boyarintsev schrieb:
How about introducing a default parameter?
The parameter keeps the method backward compatible, allowing write a
string without the prefix.
public procedure TStream.WriteAnsiString(
const S: string;
withLength: Boolean = true;
How should a string without a leng
A case for ternary computing is not really a bad idea ;)
On 21-7-2014 21:42, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Dmitry Boyarintsev schrieb:
How about introducing a default parameter?
The parameter keeps the method backward compatible, allowing write a
string without the prefix.
public procedure TSt
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 6:46 AM, tha...@thaddy.com
wrote:
> A case for ternary computing is not really a bad idea ;)
>
> On 21-7-2014 21:42, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
>
>> Dmitry Boyarintsev schrieb:
>>
>> How about introducing a default parameter?
>>> The parameter keeps the method backward c
What I was a little bit more than hinting at in my previous answers is
that it is impossible for an abstract read stream to know that there's a
string to read. There is at least one higher level of implementation
necessary: one that recognizes a string.
That means probably something like storin
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:17 PM, tha...@thaddy.com
wrote:
> What I was a little bit more than hinting at in my previous answers is
> that it is impossible for an abstract read stream to know that there's a
> string to read. There is at least one higher level of implementation
> necessary: one t
