Zitat von Vinzent Höfler [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 19:41:12 +0100
Vinzent Höfler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I understand RTLEventWaitFor correct, then it waits until another
thread calls RTLeventSetEvent.
Unless it's already signalled, then it
In our previous episode, Mattias G?rtner said:
Yes, that works under Linux. But the documentation does not mention it, so I'm
not sure if this works under all platforms.
Maybe some other OS users can try if the following code runs through:
Uses cthreads;
var
e: PRTLEvent;
begin
On 04 Dec 2008, at 11:36, Mattias Gärtner wrote:
Zitat von Vinzent Höfler [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 19:41:12 +0100
Vinzent Höfler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I understand RTLEventWaitFor correct, then it waits until another
thread calls
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008 11:59:40 +0100
Jonas Maebe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Unless it's already signalled, then it should run right through.
It was changed in 2.2.0:
http://wiki.freepascal.org/User_Changes_2.2.0#RTLEvent_persistence
Thanks.
Michael, can you add that hint to the
Hi all,
I'm looking for a high performance 'wait-for'.
The situation:
There are m threads working in parallel on n chunks of work (n=m).
The n chunks are indexed 0..n-1.
Sometimes one thread needs the result of some of the lower indexed chunks. For
example the chunk number 5 needs chunks 0..2.
Mattias Gärtner wrote:
Hi all,
I'm looking for a high performance 'wait-for'.
The situation:
There are m threads working in parallel on n chunks of work (n=m).
The n chunks are indexed 0..n-1.
Sometimes one thread needs the result of some of the lower indexed chunks. For
example the chunk
Mattias Gärtner wrote:
The situation:
There are m threads working in parallel on n chunks of work (n=m).
The n chunks are indexed 0..n-1.
Sometimes one thread needs the result of some of the lower indexed chunks. For
example the chunk number 5 needs chunks 0..2.
So I have a function
On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 19:41:12 +0100
Vinzent Höfler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mattias Gärtner wrote:
The situation:
There are m threads working in parallel on n chunks of work (n=m).
The n chunks are indexed 0..n-1.
Sometimes one thread needs the result of some of the lower indexed
On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 15:41:55 +
Martin Friebe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mattias Gärtner wrote:
Hi all,
I'm looking for a high performance 'wait-for'.
The situation:
There are m threads working in parallel on n chunks of work (n=m).
The n chunks are indexed 0..n-1.
Sometimes one
